BC Forests writes:

Hey @Odessa Orlewicz . Listend to You, James and others. Searched & found; from the WHO-web site;

"Proposal for negotiating text of the WHO Pandemic Agreement" (30 October 2023)

[apps.who.int]

Yep-they want full control....of all DNA.... (Does everyone know- we are made of the DNA and Carbon-they want to "control"? Purely, for our ignorant welfare... of course. No one is smarter than they are.... WRONG!

Evil, power-supporters- they are smarter than all who do support them! A warm reward-might await them....

Article 1. Use of terms (page 5 of 30 pages - Chapter 1. Introduction. Article 1. Use of terms

For the purposes of the WHO Pandemic Agreement:

(a) “genetic sequences” means the order of nucleotides identified in a molecule of DNA or RNA. They contain the genetic information that determines the biological characteristics of an organism or a virus;

We are organisms-they want to identify the DNA for-to inject-deadly mRNA. As they have done for years. (Creating a "New Noah's Ark" This one, is to steal lall DNA-so they can use it, some time later... Using CRSPER - gene splicing technology; to make-what ever Chimera-they chose... succes and failures. Costing us our lives, and our childrens.

Conrol of the "an organism"-we are the "organism"-they want to "treat". Remove, modify-kill. What ever it takes. For Democied and genocide. (MBAN, WBAN-biofield thefts. What ever it takes-humans are hackable animals. True!)

" “universal health coverage” means that all people have access to the full range of quality health services they need, when and where they need them, without financial hardship. It covers the full continuum of essential health services, from health promotion to prevention, treatment, rehabilitation and palliative care;"

"Article 3. General principles and approaches

To achieve the objective of the WHO Pandemic Agreement and to implement its provisions, the Parties will be guided, inter alia, by the general principles and approaches set forth below. 1. Respect for human rights – The implementation of this Agreement shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons."

Interpretation of "Respect for human rights"- When I provided my employer-research and regulations -regarding-protecting workers - humans rights (2021/2022); I was informed of forth coming disciplie; for not following "government policeis". Polices; that removed my "human-rights". But the choice to receive the discipline-was soley mine and how i"inerpretated" their threats.... Sorry, Standards of Conduct. Which thet wwere breaking, heavily.

I contacted the BC Human Rights group. Spoke with the head lady. Asked if they had any evidence regarding the existence of a virus? Nope. What about evidene that 'Masks" will stop a virus-when the manufacture's warning says' Masks do not stop virsuses."

BC Human rights informed me, firmly. If I did not where a mask; regardless of what evidene, regulations, work place regulations-research I have and think might be of value-I am required to wear a mask as instructed.

Why?

To protect those who can not wear a mask. I would be seen as putting the "disabled" at risk.. The human rights protected disabled.. Not the human rights of those not disabled. I would receive the full force of the law under their mandates-brought agaisnt me, by them. Fundedby, the BC government.

I would be charged and tossed in jail, as I should be for putting the lives of disabled, at risk. If need be. Regardles any research, i did prodice. That pubich health Order; was all included in a "Social Contract" to live in this society - do what your told, by professionals.

I was a professional, I explaned, including Federaly trained in SAR. Too bad. Was not one of their "accepted experts". So done.

Some might want to "be the Ostrich". All that does is make it easy for a "BOHICA" Moment! Might not be what one expects it to mean....