Thank you all for your replies, no harm meant, just a little fun

A better question might be is: Are Agnostics hedging?

Hardly, I think agnostics on average are more confident. They are confident enough to be honest about their knowledge of whether a god exists, where a lot of people claim to "know" when there is absolutely no evidence. It has nothing to do with a decision. You can't decide to know something. You either know it or you don't. Even though I don't know positively there is no god, I haven't been shown enough evidence to believe there is.

Not at all. If God is described as unknowable and undetectable, Then I can not claim to "know" what I by definition can not know. Theist often do claim to know in this case what they can not know. By this definition agnosticism is simply honest.

No, rather it takes self-confidence to admit you don't know things that others pretend to know.

not at all

No. I cannot prove there is a god and I cannot prove there is not a god. So say one way or the other would be a belief. I am not a believer. I just don't know. Somethings we will never know. To substitute a belief is not the answer. It simply is unknown.