I recently accidentally double posted an article, due to trying to add a picture. I hadn't presented my views and facts well enough, so chose to start over.
What I want to convey boils down to this:

1. -EACH gmo product is as unique as the original plant or animal is, AND the source of the added gene is!
   so cannot be lumped together as "" good", "bad", or "mixed".
   Studies for one cannot be used to validate or condemn another.
2. -Since the practice of making plants more resistant to chemicals, the chemicals seem to be killing off many insect species (some of which are known to be vital to continued human existence) and further contracting earth's biodiversity, and then, how do we know what plants and animals the human race can do without?
   Insert bee deaths here
   Insert monarch deaths here
   Insert snopes " unproven " link here.
3. • A little tangent here, (because I was accused of being a plant or something)
     -First, who in the world would or could pay me for doubting the oversight on GMOs?
     -Second, who could/would pay a defender of the GMO racket? Oh let me count the $$$!
     Any person reading this, please consider this point.
4. • Then, there's the matter of research. Human beings are rather long lived creatures.
     Experiments on rats etc, cannot guarantee the long term effects of gene-added, internal, (unable to be washed off) toxins or the heavily applied external chemicals will do to our kids. (Some of these chemicals and toxins have already been found in breast milk, just FYI)
     [helix.northwestern.edu] . Please, if legitimate commenters want to present their thoughts, do so. Let's do try to keep logic in the balance.

(PS, I have to come back and add those links.)