Sure most of what religion in my book has done more harm that anything I can think of. But to be honest, in their belief some have created some of the best art, the most beautiful music, and some amazing artcitecture.
Don't forget that Sir Issac Newton was a devout christian, yet he developed the laws of gravity, better yet he invented calculas to do it.
Micheal Faraday was also a devout christian, and his discoveries about electricity and magnatism, are the beginings of the electric world we live in today.
The list goes on and on.
Absolutely. I recently met a couple that had two amazing masterpieces done in oil from the 14th century. They asked me to find buyers for them, but unfortunately their asking price was too high. I've attached a photo of one. Religious or not, it's astounding work.
A nice canvas but, to be honest, I think that it's rather later than 14th century.
This example, a 14th century image from Catalan, is a good representation of art of the period - perspective and natural realism had yet to be introduced.
I have found as I grow more aware of the great damage religions do to individuals and our world, my brightest friends and myself no longer can appreciate religiously based music or art without the grim realization of the history and meaning of these peaces of lovely artwork.
Absolutely. I'd recommend John Berger's 'Ways of Seeing' - he discusses paintings within their social and economic context and questions art criticism that ignores these to focus only on the aesthetic aspects.
And honestly most of the 'great' art was commissioned to impress...and it still does in many ways. But the subject was the safest at the time of their planning.
Many artists are deeply moved by religious experiences to create. So as a catalyst, religion is ok. The figures can all be seen as mythical. Which they are. Divine inspiration can be an altered state of consciousness. Some really beautiful art has come out of it. And I suppose a lot of it was created by non-religious artists commissioned by the wealthy church. Many struggling artists would take the job even if they disagreed with the subject matter or the purpose. Unlike some cake bakers
It's most definitely possible to appreciate the art, and dislike the theology.
For me itβs possible to appreciate it in or out of context. Religion is art, not science.
Religion is delusional nonsense and neither art nor science (IMHO). However there is art associated with religion and it can be exceptional as long as one takes it for what it is.
I agree. A writer of fiction, fantasy, and horror is as much an art form as any other medium. Religion fits right in.