I'm not saying this be rude, but I don't know if you're calling out someone specific or the group of responders as a whole.

@Keita

1. just come out and accuse me of being rude.... it's 2018....
2. I'm speaking to ALL of those that follow that ridiculous idea that the poor are shit with their "fiscal conservative" aka we hate the poor and want to keep our privilege filth.

They need a name/label so I can go after them and their high horse. That kid of BS is in the global way of healing.

@MissaDixon I think the label you're looking for is Conservative.

I do consider myself fiscally conservative, but I do not believe the poor is at fault for being poor, and I do not think we should have as many poor people in this nation as we do and I do blame the greed of the wealthy for that.

As an example, In my state, the poor shoulder 3x the weight of the wealthy in paying taxes each year. That infuriates me and hearing politicians try to explain to me why that is a good thing for our economy assures me who I cannot vote for. I understand taxes must be paid in unless we plan on dissolving the government and I think a greater volume of taxes would be paid if the wealthy paid their fair share.

My interpretation of a fiscal conservative is that the government shouldn't spend more than it takes in. It creates a debt thrust be paid back.

How that works with my libertarian side, is that I believed that debt is modern day slavery, as it makes a person indebted to work with no enough money to afford to move, improved, or take on any of the American ideals, such as owning a home, or starting a family. Instead people are expected to work with high interest and low salaries, so their debt can get bigger and become a lifelong servitude aka slavery.

My liberal side says that looking for ways to keep poor people from changing their economic status is a form of oppression and acts negatively upon a Darwinian approach to the workforce. I want the best and the brightest and as a kid from the projects, I know it can be a kid from the projects and not a relative of Bill Gates with a liberal arts degree from Yale.

I can have all these sides and still call myself a fiscal conservative because I don't want the government to go broke by overspending.

However Right-Wing Corporate Conservatism puts too high a regard on businesses rights above individual rights. Flint Michigan is a good example of Big Business utilizing government control to hurt the populous and trample their liberties and health. If that is who you are referring to, I understand the animosity. They are dangerous to society and extremely well funded and organized.

I am very weary of generalizations because I don't want the innocent in the cross-fire. I hope I'm properly understanding you.

PS: You can be rude if you wish. This is just how I write. I was only trying to clarify because your brevity had me uncertain as to whom you were initially pointing out.

@Keita

No worries it's 2018, we all get that we think each other are assholes from jump...I know I am.

So Conservative Libertarian is the name for that. Cool I'll go with it.

I don't have enough info on foreign politics to ask a multinational question, but for myself, I am highly curious about American Politics since I am American. However, you can always start the same questionaire with your own countries parties.
I'd advocate that, and would appreciate the ability to compare outcomes.

And yet, you won't find any diehard white nationalists or straight-up nazis on the Democratic ticket. And no, they're not hiding behind the sofa.

@GinaMaria No, Dems just have speech nazis and black hate groups along with crazy SJWs that are fighting for all the wrong social issues. Its easy to point out a small group with crazy beliefs in both parties, so lets not.

Politicians appear to love the art of lying. Claiming Jesus is a simple way to gather the endorsements of the unintelligent. In other words, it's good for the numbers.

AronRa is running in Texas. He won't bow to anyone or any group. I'd love to see him win.

@Keita It definitely is. I am voting for some progressives in NY's state primaries (Sept. 13) and general elections (Nov. 6). They have been talking a good game. I hope I see them walk it too if I help get them elected.

But it does show signs of reasoning and intellect. I'll let you take it from there.

@chucklesIII Not necessarily. What if someone was never introduced to the concept and never had to refute it?

@mattersauce I'd like to know where they live. I'd move there in a heart beat and wouldn't contaminate the climate by ever mentioning the "R" word.

@chucklesIII Well....you can't get there from here.

It doesn't have to be tied to still show a tendency. Just like gun control and abortions are not tied to any specific political party, but if you tell me you're a libertarian, I'd have an idea of how you'd probably sway. By getting a lot of people to answer, I can look at a pattern. In reality, I'm asking a bunch of nonreligious people what their political affiliation is, but also if their lack of faith swayed it.

ie: A former Jahovas Witness who left the faith and I'd ask if it changed their view on politics.

No one is wrong. I'm gauging opinions. So I'd say there is no definitive "No" because I'm asking for opinions not hard facts.

I consider libertarianism as a prime example of a "horrible distasteful party." Of the many I have face to face debated who once promoted themselves as libertarianism, all have changed their position; and no. I have no interest in debating politics with you.

Or of the vocal minority it appears that way. I wouldn't let that sway me if it turns out to be true.