for example, if I discover that my son and his brother, are doing this, will I deal with it, i will be like blind?

@belfodil My impression is that it is a quite common form of experimentation among male siblings. The usually grow out of it, but if they don't, does it matter? They are not hurting anyone else if it is consensual.

@belfodil if siblings are having incestuous encounters, you've got bigger fish to fry than questioning if homosexualuty is a choice or hardwired.

@belfodil straight people can be incestuous too. what's incest got to do with homosexuality? why are you equating the two?

g

i agree, and only most gently wish to point out that homosexuality is not just about sex. it's about to whom one is attracted, not just sexually but romantically. it's about with whom one falls in love. sometimes people ask how a small child can know s/he is gay when, after all, s/he isn't even remotely sexually mature. well, when i was about three, i knew i was in love with gene autry. if i'd been gay i might have been in love with, say, annette funicello instead. (oh, probably not, but that's all i can think of, since i was watching the mickey mouse club at that age.) it's that simple. so it's not just about what people do in the bedroom. people in love do other stuff besides have sex.

g

@belfodil Is your son 21 and living under your roof? Your house, your rules.

@UrsiMajor that is True, but if suddenly i discovered that ... I have to look the motives, Maybe if i help him, to get back to his way, .. that will make him happier ...

what you mean by Gawd?

@belfodil Zeus, Zoroaster,, Allah, Baal, Yahweh, Astarte, Isi s, Ra, whomever

Do you think that a sane person, chooses to do that, with his brother, father, sister or mother?

@belfodil I would not, nor could not, make that decision and you probably feel the same, however, it doesn't matter what I, or YOU, think. It is totally the individual's responsibility and right to make decisions for their own lives. I stress my caveat, do or cause no harm.

@jlynn37 For example ... I took the decision to commit suicide .. Why do you not allow me to do so

@belfodil I would allow you to do so. It is your right alone to make that decision for yourself.

@belfodil again, why are you equating homosexuality with incest?

g

Just try to be balanced

Perhaps it is part of addiction

It is not a selection and not genetically

@belfodil Decades of research say you're incorrect.

Thank you for your advice ... I just wanted to share the views of these respectable faces

@belfodil Published research articles by scientists and psychologists involved in researching and studying LGBT issues are what you should be reviewing. Asking the opinion of the general public is NOT the place to start.

@SkotlandSkye It is general public that live these experiences, and it experiences themselves, Is an important part of these questions

@belfodil No, it's not. Not when you can't even frame the question correctly, not when you use antiquated terms/ideas, and not when what you are asking is best answered through legitimate research. If you want REAL answers backed by science, then you need to look at real science and not opinions. If you are just looking for people who might think/believe what you do about the subject, then opinions will do. But, opinions ARE NOT facts and just because someone may agree with you about something does not make it correct.

@SkotlandSkye the important that only can understand what I mean, if i can't even frame the question correctly, , you can help me to do that.

@belfodil Sure, my consulting fees start at $150 an hour. If you are serious, message me and I'll give you my PayPal email. Once I receive payment, I will be happy to instruct you concerning this topic.

If the only purpose for sex as far as nature is concerned is for procreation, then why do men have a G-spot hidden up their butts?

The original purpose of sex was reproduction, but evolution and nature does not care for original purpose, it reuses and reinvent structures to give new functions.
In most of mammals sex is a social factor also, in primates it becomes more clear.
Bonobos use sex for everything, from greeting to conflict resolution, and reproduction becomes a side effect.
And by the way there are some studies that claims that population of homosexuals or at least people with some homo relationships, tends to be stable at 10-15% on all societies and times, what change is the "out of the closet" proportion according how much it is accepted by society.
In some species (penguins for example) homosexual couples assume the role of foster parents, in other species they can be "soldiers" that won't compete with the alphas etc.
Anyway we are far more complex than simple primitive "natural" roles.
We have even a king of heterosexual that can only create bounds of friendship and love with others from the same sex, and "use" the opposite sex only for..... sex.
Using the natural argument is being oversimplistic, basically if we can do something (without injury for example) it is natural (and this not means good, just natural). So if a man can show love or pleasure with his but, it is natural.
I am not hetero because it is the right thing, I am hetero because I have never found a man that makes me want to have some sexual/love relationship, and at the same time I found that women gives me those intentions. I think homosexuality is simply the inverse.
Being good or not for evolution, we already passed this level as a species, we are not in risk to be destroyed by lack of reproduction or by a species beating us. We are not at a permanent war and need the next generation to be as numerous as possible to crush the enemy, so let people be happy as long as they don't cause harm to others.

@misternatureboy I have no discernable or useful answer for that.

@Pedrohbds This is why I don't typically post my opinion on this. My very last line was "With that said, I don't give a shit who anyone has sex with or loves. I think as long as it's consensual and makes you happy, do what you'd like." But you felt it necessary in your last line to tell me "so let people be happy as long as they don't cause harm to others."

People tend to get defensive and argumentative at my concept which is of course only theoretical but people still feel the need to tell me all about the entire animal kingdom. I understand that my concept that there is something "off" inside your brain is not an easy criticism to accept, but your acceptance or denial of a concept has nothing to do with the validity of it. I apologize for offending you as that is not my actual intention, but a common outcome when I explain my theory. Again, I don't really care even if my theory was proven, who anyone has sex with. Many people have actual physical disabilities and their lives and happiness is no less important than my own, however I understand that homosexual people really don't like their homosexuality being identified as anything other than normal and natural.

I think that people are different and if you try to "rate" them against each other some will come out higher than others in any measurable category. That however doesn't mean that it's a problem in society or that people should be treated differently. It means that if you want to get a message across town quickly on foot, pick Usain Bolt and not me. Different and even "disabled" or not in line with the process of procreation, does not mean less than. I'm just not sure how I can get those 2 concepts across to people on such a hot button issue.

@OwlInASack I hope I'm not too late with this advice: Get consent first!

@misternatureboy yeah I may have posted at the end of my first reply "as long as it's consensual"

Homosexuality it not caused by getting assaulted

@Remi Woosh

all correct except for choice. it's not choice. that's the one thing it is not. one may choose not to act upon one's nature, and hide who one is, and that is inevitably a choice that will take an emotional toll, but one cannot choose to be straight or gay (or whatever). one can argue for choice but the argument would have no basis whatsoever.

g