Assuming a god exists, which type is more likely?
The imaginary one . My GD had an imaginary friend, Victor, for several years. She is eight now and has outgrown him.
Well the scientist Fred Hoyle suggested in his book 'The Intelligent Universe' that there could possibly be an Intelligent 'force' that pervades the Cosmos but this is a very non anthropomorphic 'god' that would best be described as IT or THAT I kinda like the concept.
A god that exists outside the creation. Like some really OCD crazy fish-lady watching her "kids" swim around the tank.
The vaguest possible god is more likely to exist. The more detailed you get in describing them and barnacling them with doctrines and such, the less likely they become (and the more you have to prove / defend / reconcile with actual reality),
So a non-interventionist, deist god / absent watchmaker is less unlikely than, say, Jesus or Krishna.
But both are very unlikely. Also, not incidentally: it's impossible in practice to distinguish between an absent god, an indifferent god, and a non-existent god.