Thanks for your comment Jack.

How can anyone know precisely what a completely mythological 'being' ever said or did, which is precisely what this Jesus was anyway.

@Triphid I have a degree in European History (in Europe) and my prof . was a Catholic/Atheist from Belfast and lived and studied in Rome. Church history was a major part of European History. I am convinced someone like Jesus did exist and there are plenty of things to back this up. What he said and did is another matter.

@JackPedigo Well, I have a ThD in Theology and comparative Modern Religions, a Bachelors Degree in both Ancient and Modern History, plus a few more Degrees, and one of my main areas of great interest are the roman Empire in the Middle East post Gaius Julius Caesar and Ancient Egypt.
And, as we all know, the Romans were, undoubtedly, FANATICAL record keepers about literally everything they did, where, when, how, why and to whom it happened YET there is absolutely NO mention of Hebrew( Jewish) Messiah known as Yeshua(Jesus) of Nazareth nor his 'exploits'/execution by crucifixion by a Roman Governor called Pontius Pilate ( who, btw, was recalled to Rome from Pontus, not Judaea/Galilee in 21 C.E., then it is correct in saying that the biblical Yeshua bin/ibn/bar Yusef ( Jesus son of Joseph) did NOT exist, BUT a Yeyoshua bin Yusef was captured, tried and executed along with 2 of his ' lieutenants' for the crimes of Arson, Sedition, Theft, Murder, Rape and Pillage, Slave Trading, etc, etc, and the remainder of the band of 13 were sent to spend their days as Galley Slaves.
Please read the history of the Flavians written by Flavius Josephus ( previously a Jew taken as a slave to the Flavian family AFTER he turned TRAITOR to his OWN people and was later given his freedom by the Flavians).
You MAY plainly see that the entire myth was a creation by Flavius Josephus to ' curry' favour with his adoptive family and a necessary 'step-up' the ladder to deification as per the Roman way.

@Triphid Thanks for the clarification. We get a lot of denial here from people who are just being silly. That said, yes there are few mentions of a lot of things people think are real that are not. I have read a lot on this subject from valid historians and they all have some evidence of a leader that others followed. This includes carvings and frescoes of said person. I recently wrote the National Geographic on an article they wrote about Jesus' footsteps. The org tried to walk the middle road and play both sides which I said was unprofessional. A article last month about searching for sacred texts was more honest.
In all my years of study and everything I have learned it has only been here that I have heard people denying the existence of a Jesus. Most people are only repeating what they have heard or are the conspiracy type. I am not convinced especially from one person no matter how valid. And even if I were what's the point of trying to prove billions of people have been and are just plain wrong.

@JackPedigo To my mind the point is to ensure that the Truth is told despite the protestations of the 'faithfools.'