The law doesn’t take effect until enough states have bought into it to be able to win the electoral vote. And as I understand it, the way the Electoral College works is that it’s up to the individual states to decide how to choose their electors, so I don’t see why the SC would get involved.

@jerry99 Because the Constitution designed the electoral college to take in consideration states right as well as population. This subverts it. So they can strike it down and recommends that if you don't like it then change the constitution. No state should have power over any other state, In effect that what the pact does.

@Biosteelman Considering that 2 of the last 3 presidents lost the popular vote, I'd say that this is an idea that's way overdue. Previously, there were only 3 other presidents that lost the popular vote. The Repubs have successfully gamed the system and it needs to be changed.

@jerry99 I disagree. This means candidates who lost weren't paying attention to little states. Maybe start thinking about the whole country and not just the city centers.

I'm going back in 8 years. I hate living in the central time zone for one thing.