Occasionally, I get started into a movie only to discover that it's a Christian movie intended to convert people. I find they all have one thing in common. The acting is terrible. All this time I've been thinking that it's because they figure they don't need to put too much effort into it because it's the "word of God" but today I began to wonder if it's just because that seems to be the nature of Christian people trying to spread a message. Either way, it's almost like I can spot a Christian movie right off the bat by the bad acting.
Edit: I differentiate between movies meant to convert and depictions of biblical stories. Every movie I've seen that is specifically geared toward converting people has had bad acting. Biblical depictions have usually been good quality. The movie that sparked my comments was Left Behind with Nicholas Cage. Others would include War Room, Fireproof, and Courageous. Another thing they have in common is that they usually don't make it obvious it's a Christian movie. You find out when you're watching.
Just like porn movies.Terrible acting. Stupid stories.
Same "acting" pool.
I was a closet nonbeliever when I watched the Mel Gibson The Passion of the Christ with others. While watching it, beyond all of the blood and horrendous things in it, I was thinking of both the science and psychology of what was actually being shown.
harrowing story and viciously bloody - too realistic in parts. shows some of what happened when you threatened the state
The Hypathia movie for a few years back toned down the part where the Christian's flayed her alive. In the movie she took poison
Quite agree with that. Worse than The Bold and The Beautiful or whatever it is called and it’s ilk!
Spot them within the first scene in most occasions
It’s not just you. Terrible directing, terrible script writers, implausible plots. In the movie God is NOT Dead (1), the Atheist Philosophy Professor allows his student to appoint himself God’s defense attorney while appointing the Professor the prosecutor in trying the case of whether God created the universe. The null hypothesis should have been God is innocent of creating the Universe and the alternative Hypotheses should have been God created the Universe. So the roles the student decided on should have been reversed with the student as the prosecutor and the professor as the defense attorney. So in this case, the folks making the movie even had terrible consultants. A real Philosophy Professor would never have allowed his student to present the argument in this way. Of course the entire plot of the movie was contrived and ridiculous.
I avoid biblical movies like the plague.
Like a plague of locusts or a plague of blood?
They have bad acting because they have bad actors. People in popular films that claim they are personally a Christian are usually just going with a current trend. Christian movies suck. I don't watch them. In "God Is Dead" the atheist hated god because god allowed his father to die. Apparently their was a handy priest on the scene at the end.
"the atheist hated god." i am aware it is a synopsis. their writing is extremely bad? the atheist hates that which they don't believe exists? that is not credible, not even possible. logically it makes no sense.
atheists cannot hate god, or they are not atheists.
If you differentiate between mainstream movies with a religious theme and movies made for the Christian market for evangelists to use to reinforce faith and retain doubters, such as the fucking awful "God's NOT Dead" franchise then Yes especially Pureflix productions.
I can only conclude since they do have a stock of semi decent actors, that the directors must actually insist on this wooden as a crucifix delivery and performance.
Kevin Sorbo (normally a very competent performer) is in a number of these films and seems to wander through them pointing his hair at people and keeping his face so botox straight that you could mistake him for a ventriloquist's dummy.
I recommend "Jesus Bro" a wonderful parody made on a nothing budget by Brad Jones (the Cinema Snob) a couple of years ago.
Like the Kirk Cameron things?
Even those epic Cecil B films had bad acting but are fun to watch for the over bloated more cowbell panoramas.
Life of Brian is pretty good. But yes, that is satire.
They're inherently bad because their message is inherently weak. Well intended, but weak.
Well intended my butt.
"Good intentions are the source of all folly..."
Robert Heinlein