immoral. b/c all voting does is encourage & legitimize the corrupt, crooked bastards.

We vote for someone who’ll uphold our ideals, not instantly write-off their opponent’s supporters … as we’re now experiencing at the executive level in the USA. If anyone’s looking for an excuse not to make a choice, and hasn’t the guts to run themselves, this appears the post for them

NOT VOTING is endorsing the status quo. Period.

The type of voting must be questioned here. If like in the UK and USA a First Past the Post/winner take all is used, then this can be immoral but not always. Then the rest who use some sort of proportional representation method may be more moral and inclusive, but produces a little for all and no clear winner much of the time.
Morality is subjective, what was moral for a Roman of the 1st Century is not moral for me a man in the 21st. In other words, NAZIs carried out acts of morality based upon their rules and norms, which in the pre-NAZI era would be seen as immoral. Here I am talking about removal of the rights to vote not the holocaust.
In quick conclusion - it is moral to vote if that is the cultural norm of your society to do so. It is immoral to force a vote if it is not. With the later, imagine soldiers having to vote for or against every order they were given.
I suggest reading Machiavelli Discourses on Livvi. He argues that the involvement of the many in voting reduces the extreme potential from leaders.