Agnostic.com

20 34

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

20 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Yes and take the church/state separation seriously for a change.

1

Oh we have one already.... .. do you truly believe 45 angelical crap is for other reason than getting people to his team?

1

Yes, yes and yes.

2

I think we are ways off from that happening here in the US. I suppose you want them to be a socialist as well as an atheist?

Question noted and ignored.

@HippieChick58 Why ignored?

@zesty past history with poster, I just don't want a drawn out conversation that goes nowhere.

@HippieChick58 I thought you liked to argue with us conservatives.

@Trajan61 Discussion maybe, but argue? I have better things to do with my time. Neither one of us is going to change our position. My Grammy said "pick your battles." This time/place I will pass.

2

unfortunately people are not there yet

zesty Level 7 Nov 20, 2019
4

Until Atheists non believers etc are at least 50 percent of the population no openly atheists politicians would have the guts to run.

1

I agree. our first amendments rights, the establishment clause, the separation of church and state, are not safe with the current administration, and one of the supreme court justices, there are some good non religious government members, like Rep. Jared Huffman, and others out there that would make a good president.

1

Elected officials have to pander and speak loftily. I think a logic-driven, scientific mind is repelled by this idea.

1

An illogical person that does not say they are sorry and make proper restoration appropriate for wrongs that's been done?

Sounds like every president since the Masonic lodge secret religion racist devil worshippers freedom of England July 4th, 1776 taking this land, its wealth, value, gold etc. from the original indigenous inhabitants and not giving it back so not everyone can have their own brick home, business and property built by true masons free from mortgage, free from rent, free from taxation, free from governmental terrorism and free from religious oppression.

Word Level 8 Nov 19, 2019
1

How about an actual human being that thinks about something other than their "I wants" once in awhile?

4

I will settle for anybody but the orange turd and his band of republican accessories to crime.

4

How about an unapologetic agnostic?

Why not both? 🤔😀

2

With National Prayer Breakfast headed up by all the politicians for the politicians?

These so called secret society cults should end before it's possible for an Atheist to lead or be part of that office! America is lead and headed by Evangelical Right Cults - Christianity!

2

IMO, the poster should identify such article sources that are clearly OPINION.

I pretty much knew it was opinion from the title on the article.

4

Idk, personally I'm rooting for the Hindu & the Jew.

5

That would be nice but it isn't high on my list. Not having a russian puppet and criminal there might seem like a low bar but since we DO have one there, it seems a good place to start.

g

5

Its time to get rid of the office of president, and to start dismantling the worlds governments.

They do not work. Power does not belong in these ridiculous structures. They cause wars and worse.

SCal Level 7 Nov 18, 2019

One World Government!

@Storm1752 You clearly missed my point.

@Allamanda

A resource based economy. A robot government and an emergent society, not a fixed society.

@Allamanda

But anarchy is superior to governments operated by humans. All of the abhorrent behavior you can think of takes place because of and is never fixed by governments. In fact, govts are the cause of almost all abhorrent behavior.

So in that sense, if you cure cancer, a tumor, a virus or disease, what would you replace those with?

There is only one God and it is called Government.

Give me anarchism.

4

or one who professes no religious leanings

I think that was Karl Marx. How did that work out for him again?

4

But I would settle for any well-trained primate who won't go around soiling the furniture, tearing up precedent, and hurling feces at the foreign policy. Like a gibbon or an orangutan. Even someone from the Greens, at a pinch.

4

That would be the best thing for the country for sure. But until the public as a whole sees religion as silly Luke England does, it won't happen I don't think. A Christian is too bigoted to vote for an atheist. Wouldn't you agree?

They'd vote for a gay black woman first.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:428358
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.