Agnostic.com

6 4

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I read thru this article , as I was able to , but I could not make the connection they were implying 🤷♀️
I really do not like using the stuff , but I do not want to have to forgo my self isolation , & mow grass every 7~10 days either 🙎♀️😒
My upper lungs are damaged from heavy smoking from 30 years ago. I am clean now , but the resolve of my vices from a younger life are still a factor .
Are they drawing any real conclusions ?

Dougy Level 7 Apr 13, 2020
1

Sounds like pseudo science

2

Must be blocked ?

3

More woo......just what we need right now........
In fact a classic example of monomania. She fears & dislikes the product. (And I am not saying she is wrong in that) but to then make it the "root" problen of every other thing in the world is just silly.

4

Too rambling and tenuous. The author is struggling to link anything to Glyphosate to support this hypothesis. Unfortunately, it doesn't make logic.
For instance, why doesn't Almeria have more deaths? Why does Germany, with so many infections, have so few deaths, yet uses a lot of bio-fuel?
Maybe the dots need numbers on them.

1

The existence of glyphosate is one important reason why organic foods are considered safer. Though continuous proximity to glyphosate in various types of pollution may be more deadly.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:482559
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.