You ask"...aim of the equal protection law already covers fat people, so what would you like added?"

In general use," LGBT" is what I see as most common, adding the "F" so that common usage would be something like "FGLBT".

Further to address for clarification, if a scenario of a fat person were to oppose the alternative lifestyle people or cause of "LGBT" , by adding the "F" would then give for a reason that a fat person couldn't logically oppose '"FGLBT" because they are in that alternative category.

@Word That makes no sense, of course they could still oppose equal rights for the other included groups because presently, the equal protection laws aren't needed to protect fat people. That's like saying the nineteenth amendment shouldn't have been opposed by any men because it included verbiage in it that prevented men being denied the right to vote based on their gender. They already had the right to vote, so adding them to the law doesn't functionally change anything for them.

Is gluttony the sole reason for obesity?

@FearlessFly it would seem to me obese is obese no matter how one arrives. So, why exclude or only allow for any specific reason for getting there?

@Word My question explores the gluttony choice -- a distinct difference from genetics.

There are folks who claim LBGT is a CHOICE. Is your 'poll' question based on a premise that these "alternative lifestyles" are choices ?

@FearlessFly how is choice not connected to genetic configuration of the brain to decide how to make choices?

@Word I will leave the 'nature vs. nurture' and/or 'free will' debate(s) to others.

@Word remember Jerry Lewis, slender all his life,had to start taking heavy doses 9f prednisone, blew up like a balloon, about 250.....lots of conditions can cause it. I was not slender,but okay, thenhad to have the same knee replaced twice within 3 months, now have limited mobility. Put on 45 lbs & there it stays......