I've read about this. The primary problem was they outsourced ballots to third parties th thad a biasede interest.

However, it should be pointed out that the fraud was very easily discovered in the one city where this took place. Why because mail in voting leaves a papper trail that can be easily checked. Unlike touch screen voting, which has noi way to verify votes and are easily hacked.

If you look at Washington and Oregon which have used vote by mail for the longest time,
Alaska and Colorado have only started vote by mail a few years ago, when fraud was attempted, the people were easily discovered and caught.

The people behind the fraud in your post were easily discovered an caught. That is a good system when those who try to commit fraud are so easily discovered and caught.

Voter ID laws are more to suppress the vote, than they are to limit fraud. For instance the voter ID law in South Dakota required a street address on the I.D. Hoever the native Americans dont' have street addresses on the reservations, and use Post Office Boxes to get mai. So, they in effect prevented mos Native Americans in that state from voting.

If you go state by state and look at the voter I.D. laws you will find a tweak d3esigned to prevent some groups from voting is almost every case.

Theoretically, yes. However, Barr, Trump's attorney general isn't all that ethical or law abiding. And, by the time any court action is settled the elections are long over.