Some agnostics seem to have the feeling that I tried to bragger with Lagrangian Mechanics and String theory. It was not intended. I know little about the mathematical formalism involved. If I would not have mentioned that the formalism of the professionals may agree with my vibration model, nobody would have payed attention. My vibration model is just the conclusion of me, a commoner or lay-person who tries to understand 4D space-time.
My conclusion of a vibration hierarchy may have similarities with the string theory. It turned out that my vibration hierarchy is original and not a reinvention of the wheel. The reaction of the people isn't all bad. I guess, Columbus got by far more disrespect when he concluded that the earth must be round.

Hierarchic organization exists across the board; macro and micro. No evidence I know of to suggest otherwise.

I think I'm going to add "No one interested in 4D space time please" to my profile

I gotta say, what are you taking?

This post is just too far above the heads of most of us "commoners" (I guess you mean lay persons).

Why is there a desire to over complicate truth? There are 3 Dimensions - Time is not a dimension. You can move through dimensions - not through time

What on earth, or who on earth, are commoners?

I agreeish with that..and what's wrong with commoners knowing and understamding 4D?

I'll learn this when I start college. I'm going for
the Bachelor's in Science degree.

Gee mate, is this a piss contest? ???

Separation (vector) in 4D Spacetime:

S^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - (ct)^2

Also E= mc^2 only if the mass is stationary with respect to you. Otherwise you need to introduce gamma - the Lorentz transform.

Finally, mass and time are manifestations (consequences) of energy.

Full disclosure - I studied physics for a year and a half at uni.
Unless the OP has a least a doctorate in physics I would regard the question as a maldigested grab-bag of buzz-words. If a thing is worth saying it can generally be said clearly. That said, he may be genius, whose words have gone straight over my head. I doubt it, but I am ready to retract everything I've said if I turn out to be wrong.

To approach an understanding of 4D space-time, I would suggest the following:
Consider a particle of light (a photon) - all observers 'see' it travelling at exactly the same speed (the speed of light, natch) however they are moving in relation to it. If I'm running away from it at a million miles a second it will still hit me at exactly the same speed as someone who is running towards it at a million miles a second. When you have digested that amazing fact, and if it interests you, go to the library or Youtube - you have taken the first step to wanting to understand spacetime.

String Theory,Membrane Theory,Seem Too Be The Two Main Theories Around.16&32 Dimensions.

Who or what is a commoner?

I have a metal ruler, so it has no covalent bonds.

I don't. I won't pretend to either. I wanted to take calculus in my last year of high school but they pulled it because the teacher retired. I got stuck with functions. I've been a bitter, shallow speck of a man since.

Ok??????