Interesting speculation. I must note that the novel "Nightfall" was derived from the short story with that name that Isaac Asimov had written some days before.

IMO, it's very dynamically implausible. The more distant stars would have to emit a lot of light to illuminate a planet in that fashion, and that will make them short-lived. Also, it may be difficult for a moon to hide -- it will likely eclipse the other stars also.

So instead of full daylight, what one is likely to get from the more distant stars is twilight, though that may be enough to hide the stars outside the system.

They have found at least one planet that does not rotate. There are probly more. There are also planets traveling through space with no sun to provide light.

I live in a part of Scotland where we only have about one month of night time left for a while!

A habitable planet? that exists in daytime all the time? Maybe. Uninhabitable, many exist.

Yes, but not as he described it, and the article presents some workable but absurd propositions. It is certainly possible to have several red dwarf stars in it but highly unlikely they would share the same orbit. Might be fun to see what could be done without those rings of 'evenly spaced' stars. I might just do that -- but not now.