I think that could set a dangerous precedent. The republicans would use this at some stage in the future no doubt and seize power by excluding Democrats. It would make the Democrat mo better than the Republicans and serve no benefit. If the Democrat want to strengthen democracy in the US then doing something like that would serve to help tear it down. Be careful what you wish for.

Even if she doesn't they won't gain much respect from the other members. I did read that none of the republican senators signed on to the brief. It will be interesting to see how many get re-elcted at the next mid-term vote.

For the second time in the 250 years of this experiment in Democracy we have a group of primarily rich white males who view themselves as they only ones capable of running the show.
After the Civil War none of the men who lead the Confederate States to secede and war were ever held accountable. That might have worked out but Lincoln was assassinated and Johnson took over. He basically told Congress I got this no need to return (no jumpin' on a jet, train or driving your car back to DC like today). He then proceeded to undo reconstruction and placed back in power the very men who engineered the forming of the states that seceded and that led to the Civil War.
This time around these men/women need to be held accountable - IMHO.

The Republicons would certainly make the same move if the situation was reversed — but Democrats aren't stupid enough endorse such an outrageous lawsuit.

Pascrell cites Section 3 of the 14th amendment – which states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” cannot serve in federal office – claiming the lawsuit seeks to “obliterate public confidence in our democratic system” and that those who signed it committed “unbecoming acts that reflect poorly on our chamber.”

At the very least, they have revealed their complete ignorance of how our governance is supposed to work...mandatory re-education?