Well this is an interesting one. A lot to unpack and a lot of it might come down to definitions and assumptions of meaning. I found a lot of things I agreed with, like rethinking our 'special' place in nature, and the integration of all life. But since I have long since dispensed with the word humanism, for the reason that it can mean anything and everything, I can't see myself embracing posthumanism. I'm not convinced that negative connotations that the author associates with 'humanism' really stands up either, or why adding 'post' to humanism reinvents humanism for the 21st century. The author seems to have a sanguine view about the integration of technology and biology in the human body ( a Millennial view perhaps?) but for myself I rather worry we are on the road to become something like the Borg in Star Trek. Yuk! Interesting ideas in this piece, but I don't care much for the word humanism and i doubt 'posthumanism' will grab me either.