I’m not sure I understand why you say that. What is your definition of a “true vaccine?” The whole point of this article in Nature is to cite the contributors and incremental steps that led to the mRNA vaccination, and who is most deserving of the Nobel Prize. Nobody would be talking Nobel prize for a vaccine that isn’t “true.”
A vaccine contains a dead or deactivated pathogen, stimulating an immune response, to prevent or lessen the impact of an infection of the live pathogen.
The mRNA inoculation hijacks a cell's programming, causing the cell to imitate the pathogen, hopefully triggering a similar immune response. The re-programming of the cell frequently causes a myriad of unintended side-effects, often resulting in death of permanent disability.
principia scientific international
@PBuck0145 It would appear that your source is unreliable. Perhaps a more scientific publication would be more helpful?
what is it?
The mRNA hijacks the cell's genetic messaging, causing the cell to imitate the markers of a virus.
A true vaccine contains a dead or deactivated pathogen.
@PBuck0145 so we should Always stick to 100+ year old concepts? You are such a scaredy-cat!