Agnostic.com

3 0

So it took less time to be disenchanted with Biden than it did Trump. Does this mean that you are collectively becoming more intelligent or just more selfish?

Quinnipiac University poll found that "Just under half of Americans (48 percent) say they think it would be bad for the country if Joe Biden ran for president in 2024, while 37 percent think it would be good for the country."
"A majority of Americans (60 percent) think it would be bad for the country if Donald Trump ran for president in 2024, while 32 percent think it would be good for the country."

So which rabbit will be pulled out of the hat? Biden's approval rating is sinking faster than Trump's did over the same time in office

[poll.qu.edu]

FrayedBear 9 Jan 13
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

What percentage of those knuckle-dragging morons has become disenchanted with Trump? The rest of those stats is directly related to how fucking stupid his base is.

1

/rant
. . . finally, a credible source (unlike f-ing RT, putins' mouthpiece)
rant/

Inflation can be a 'tough nut' -- pandemic, distribution/shortage problems -- 'too many dollars chasing too few goods'. 😛
Employment is at (near? ) record highs, many record Wall Street numbers. 🙂

Laughed my ass off Fly. I was alerted to the poll through RT so knowing how much it puts your nuts in a knot simply did a search on the origin. The above says the same as RT but as you & many of your countryfolk are blinded by the two letters I've done something different.
Thank you for commenting.
Oh have you seen your inflation figures recently?

@FrayedBear . . . from one of my responses in an earlier post

"Do you think Joe Rogan should be taken off the air as some news Network called for?"
"I don't know of any broadcast media that presents ONLY facts -- and nothing else. Even selection/exclusion of facts shows bias"

I would argue that selection of SOURCE(s) shows bias/non also.
I haven't argued that RT is universally wrong, I would argue their reporting is anathema wrt Critical Thinking.

3

IMO, the question comes down to policies and court appointments. Do you want someone in office who guts environmental regulations, weakens consumer protections and favors Wall Street over Main Street (i.e., corporate interests over the little guy), and who appoints judges who support these policies and furthermore want to turn back the clock on abortion rights and the separation of church and state? Or, do you prefer the opposite of that?

What has Biden done to ensure that that Covid 19 hasn't done for him?
And has the church & state been separated? Judicial monkeys of different hue appointed? Abortions & infanticide re-approved? Corporate taxed lifted back to 1950 levels?

@SpikeTalon & @David1955 I will continue to state that the only good pollies are those dead for 50 or more years. Furthermore I devote very little of my time to politics - the less the better.
As I did many years ago I continue to observe that the only sensible lifestyle is one in the pursuit of hedonism. Now with the increased threat of life termination through covid 19 it is the only thing that makes sense.
So as a long dead friend said "if the tsunami is coming, I'm stuck at sea level without a willing fuck partner then the only answer is to sit on the beach with a bottle or two of Johnny Walker, a firm shaking hand, a clear conscience and drink & masturbate until I'm drowned."

In the meantime I'm trying to stay off the grog, find a mental & physical fuck partner whilst enjoying whatever minor pleasures come my way.

@SpikeTalon hence why I'm into pet sitting. They are usually grateful & appreciative even if their owners aren't.

@David1955 how does that song go?

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:644997
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.