In my opinion the fifty arguments are fatuous and off-base, ignoring the basic facts of our existence as consciously aware beings.They are kindergarten arguments, addressed to kindergarteners, a metaphorical food fight.
No need to use the word “God” if you don’t like it— after all, the word has been horribly debased by organized religion. Words are just words, but regardless, there remains in our realm some very heady mysteries of staggering implication that merit our attention and awe.
Unfortunately, none of these are "proofs". Strong indicators, yes, but they do not meet the requisites of a proof. They cannot be defended any more than believers can defend the opposite notions.
I agree that the posits as presented would certainly cause anyone who is moderately rational in their thinking to rethink and perhaps reject their previous beliefs, but the keyword is "rational". We are dealing with people who have rejected rational thought when it comes to their religious beliefs and are already lying to themselves. For them, all of this will appear to be nothing more than the work of the enemy, of Satan; a demonic attack on their beliefs and their only choice is to double down.