The Christian hate-group Family Research Council, which has long been a non-profit organization pushing a conservative agenda, is now technically a “church” in the eyes of the IRS, according to a new report from ProPublica. That designation allows it to shield information about donors, salaries, and more from the public eye.
FRC and its leader Tony Perkins have spent the past several years fighting against things like civil rights for LGBTQ people and abortion rights. As a non-profit group, they have every right to do this. But like all non-profits, their tax-exempt status comes with a simple catch: They have to file a Form 990 report with the IRS explaining (among other things) how much money they took in, how it was spent, and how much their top staffers made in salaries. The 990s are public documents that allow the public to keep tabs on whether non-profits are really living up to their mission.
Importantly, that rule does not apply to churches, even though they’re also technically non-profits. They don’t have to fill out the form. They don’t have to make those details public. That means we don’t always know how much money big-name megachurch pastors make—or how much of the congregation’s money goes right into his pocket. We don’t know who’s donating to those churches or where all the money goes. ...
The IRS lost all its balls years ago when it comes to churches. Hell, anybody can start one these days. I read about some guys who got a place to hang out, drink beer, smoke weed, and talk bs. Their only complaint, they had to open it to the public. They said most visitors have been pretty cool though.
I'll ask my accountant if I should claim my roofing company as a church
I remember decades ago a bingo parlor in my hometown managed to con their way into being recognized as a church by the IRS and the state Dept. of Revenue...
Dear IRS: I REALLY HATE getting up and going to work. Praise Jesus. Am I good to go?
@twill It might be worth a try!
The bar for establishing a religion is actually pretty low in the U.S. I think it just requires six or more people who meet once a week and filing a statement of beliefs and not all that much more. I remember reading about that back in the late 1970's. Things may have changed, but I doubt it.
The recent revelations about Jim Comey and Johnathan Wray both being subjects of the same type of deeply invasive IRS audit (the odds against this happening at random are astronomical) indicates that Trump used the IRS to go after his political opponents. If the Service can be used (abused) like that, then maybe somebody inside is taking kickbacks in exchange for favorable treatment.
Some coincidences are simply too improbable to not be conspiracies...