It isn't banned? I was led to believe it was. Just like bralessness.

Ummmmm, no.

I admire his optimism in believing we could get this all sorted out in a year. Then again, it's satire, so he's granted some latitude.

If I thought it truly would work, I'd consider sacrificing my sex life to the cause for a year, but I think it would only be a reflection of our current rights with these draconian abortion laws: the common people would go without, while the rich and privileged continued to have sex and abortions. As I love sex, and thoroughly enjoy the thrill of no periods or pregnancy fears at this age, I'll abstain from abstaining for whatever time I have left to enjoy it.

Not me! I really love sex!

Unfortunately the women most affected by these Draconian laws are young and nubile. Most of their partners are the same and I would almost guarantee their partners disagree with the anti-choice laws. Unfortunately they're not the people making those laws. I desperately hope they will wake up and start voting in greater numbers and get rid of the old farts.

I can live without it. Now.
Not 50 years ago, and not everyone is as old and decrepit as we are.

Can we just ban sex for the lawmakers and supporters of these ridiculous restrictions? What about manslaughter charges for those same lawmakers for every woman's death those laws cause. Included could be deaths from pregnancy complications that were known that doctors could have prevented and those caused by back alley abortions.

Why not. It would allow the air to clear and give time for good decisions to be fought out.