That original post was a little bit incorrect. The post says "gender on their birth certificate at the time of birth without exception". The HB2 bill said, "birth certificate", and it allowed people to go into the correct restroom if the certificate had been changed.
The big issue with that is that many jurisdictions never allow anyone to change the gender on their birth certificate. Or they do, but have requirements that can't be met by the individual. Or they just haven't been able to get it done yet, because it takes time. So for those people it ended up being the same.
I understand the point, and hope it opens up some eyes, and changes minds. Still, it kind of reinforces the notion that trans people are valid only if they look classically cis. ?
Sadly, we have to make some allowances to get anywhere. We can't expect immediate satisfaction and acceptance. That's one thing I don't understand about people in fights for rights like this. You're not going to get everything all at once. Be happy with the small achievements and continue to work for the larger ones.
@Melbates While I agree that there will never be a change that grants "everything all at once", it is still a position that has to be fought for. For one, if only a few rights are asked for, then once they are granted, and the next rights are asked for, those who made the concessions will (and have!) complained about the oppressed just taking more and more, and never being satisfied. "We gave them everything they asked for, and they're never satisfied! They're getting greedy!"
Another reason is because the compromise positions that are inevitably arrived at will be somewhere between what is asked for and the status quo. If few things are asked for, then the compromise will contain very little. If I'm haggling with you to sell you something that is worth at least $20, then I won't ask for $22. I need to ask for $40. Or $50. Or $100! I won't get it, but if I don't ask for it, then what I eventually get will not be anywhere near what I need.
On top of that, the piecemeal approach may work in a historical context, but what about the people alive now? We don't have a right to ask a person to give up a portion of their life to wait for progress. Telling people to "just wait" is patently unfair when this is the only life they ever get. That argument was made around marriage equality, and many people died before they were ever given a chance for happiness and acceptance. Even those who survived, had to live a portion of their life without what they deserved.
Posted by snytiger6Hundreds of love letters between two gay men during WWII ...
Posted by snytiger6All for love and ...
Posted by snytiger6Being gay is not a sin ...
Posted by snytiger6Bigot Bird ...
Posted by snytiger6Pride is important ...
Posted by snytiger6Coming out ...
Posted by snytiger6Larissa awakens Christmas morning to find ...
Posted by CliffordCook([iowafaithleadercoalition.
Posted by snytiger6Victoria's Secret model, huh ...
Posted by snytiger6I come in peace ...
Posted by snytiger6You need to find peace with your uniqueness...
Posted by snytiger6The only choice made was to be myself...
Posted by snytiger6The day you graduate from...
Posted by snytiger6Trust me. There is no other man...
Posted by snytiger6The bible belt...
Posted by snytiger6Condiment come out...