My Facebook friend wrote a post in which he said that a frivolous selfie gets hundreds of likes and comments instantly, whereas a 'factual post' written by spending time with painstaking information from various sources craves likes or comments. Is this our habit of evading serious subjects or an over-attachment to physical beauty, disrespect for labor or indifference to ideas, or something else? This post may not be read by many people who are only interested in selfies or online friendship/chat.

The same is seen in a society where symbols have been made more important than ideas.In a society in which the possibility of detailed analysis, criticism or investigation has been eliminated by embodying intangible and multidimensional things like kindness, learning, pride, wealth, power, religion, adharma in symbols, then the symbol of 'personality' is 'body' (and The symbol of 'character' becomes 'sex organs', because it is easiest to assume.

People tolerate attacks on humans but not symbols.Here 'symbols' are more important than 'ideas' and 'human sensibilities' because it takes effort to understand and analyze ideas, no one wants to work hard, and society does not respect those who are working, because 'labour' And respect for 'human sensibilities' is not part of this culture. Here the less hard working person is seen with respect and the back hard worker is looked down upon, this trend is also the reason for the plight of this society.

I couldn't find a better example than Hedi Lamarr to show how people value your appearance more than your work or talent. Hedi was an Austrian-American inventor and actress who developed a World War II torpedo radio guidance system with fellow musician George Antheil, the principle of which is the basis for today's GPS, CDMA, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth technology. But people named him Hollywood Bombshell ('Patakha' in Hindi), Hedy said in anguish that my beauty is my curse.

This example is foreign, but the people of India are also not untouched by such behavior. Specially proportioned eyes-nose-lips on a specially designed skull, a certain skin complexion, height, and physique became universal standards of beauty (even today a large population considers these body patterns to be the best) because such The people who were like this, made the renaissance and industrial revolution and shaped the modern world civilization.If these revolutions had taken place in Africa or Asia, then perhaps universal patterns of beauty would have been influenced by the physical characteristics of Asia or Africa.

Although now such things are kept in the category of 'racism' and such behavior in foreign countries is the subject of criticism and laughter, but here discrimination on the basis of appearance is still common and acceptable. Many famous western comedians do not make fun of things that people do not choose themselves like face, race, gender, physical condition etc. But most of the jokes of India's famous Kapil Sharma are based on body shaming, misogyny and humiliation of other characters.

I used to be the popstar of my college, Charlie Chaplin and Picasso, but it was my appearance that did not match the 'typical rockstar image', my short stature and dark complexion forced some people to ignore me despite my good performance. Underestimate and reject, although I did not have any dearth of likes. But never in my lifetime, a light skin, tall and slim girl ever proposed me.

Just think! "Have you seen your face?" Why is the most famous line spoken on an unsolicited offer? Why not “have you seen your wisdom?” or “have you seen your thoughts?" Peter Dinkleigh played serious roles in several Hollywood films, including The X-Men, and won the Golden Globe and Emmy Awards for supporting actor in the TV series Game of Thrones. Peter is about four and a half feet tall but due to his height, his talent was never ignored and his role was not limited. In India, actors like Nawazuddin were not given long roles because they were black and did not look like "heroes". Discriminatory treatment on any ground makes the doer cruel and the sufferer frustrated.

Lucy movie says learning is painful, I find it quite right because to achieve a particular objective (knowledge, skill) one has to constantly labor and struggle which leads to chemical activation of our muscles. Increases, the result is fatigue and pain, and to remove this fatigue the objective should be attractive.And also we need right nutrition, training and entertainment, which is sorely lacking in a large population of the country. As a result, a large population is far away from many of the necessary knowledge and skills. But on the other hand, when many objectives of a group with comfort and privilege are fulfilled without/less labor/struggle, then it starts blowing the serious problems of others also in the air. According to a survey published in The Independent in 2016, India is the most ignorant country in the world, meaning there is a tendency to avoid knowing things here.

There is indeed "labor" in a society based on the privileges of gender, caste, religion, race, wealth etc., but people have no respect and reverence for it, (people have saved all reverence for symbols). A closer look reveals that everyone here wants to 'save' their hard work, 'save hard work' has become our 'national character'. This whole society teaches us to save hard work, my physics head used to say, “If you work hard now, then life will be easy in future”, my colleague used to say “you are new now, you will have to work harder, when you become old then you will have to work less.”, my mentor and team leader used to say, “There is hard work in this project only,the next ones are very easy".Why is hard work projected as a 'punishment' and comfort as a 'reward'? why this is not taught to bring 'hard work' and 'lesuire' to life in a balanced way and increase ability/skills?

Any substance wants to remain in a state of its minimum activity, but this is the quality of non-living matter, living matter is always struggling to save its existence, all its systems are always active in this work, then this society is inactive??People want to become an officer so that they do not have to become a laborer, a worker wants to become a supervisor because there is less work, people want to collect a lot of money to feed their seven generations, people want a government job because there is no work pressure. Everyone wants to impose his work on the other, and the whole society is behaving like this, it is not a sign of a healthy society or individual.To the extent that we make ourselves inactive, in the same amount we become dead, and dead matter does not struggle and resist any decaying change.