Should Muslim neighborhoods be broken up? I see videos of Americans traveling through these neighborhoods and being harassed to leave simply because they aren't Muslim faith. If they come over here and band together then they are not blending into our society.

Sounds like a great idea to me. That's progress in my eyes.

Those people admitted to this country should take an oath to abide by the laws of this country. If they do not want to do that they should look elsewhere. Religion was to be separate from government and to have any who do not agree with this program enter this country would be a travesty

People who become citizens pledge to uphold the Constitution which demands separation of & government. Tell that to the Southern Baptists, & the evangelicals. Those born here do not take an oath. Maybe they should. For you to say "All " of anything is prejudice. You are prejudging people by a & not their internal beliefs.

Regarding the statements in your first paragraph, I have no idea what our current White House occupant "wants," despite his campaign slogan.

I voted no

On Sunday, it's 8 no, 3 yes, and the third answer has 0. Maybe not only Muslims, but everybody that is not a citizen of this country needs to promise (whatever that is worth) that they are willing to abide by the laws of this country and also to believe in separation of church and state.
I wonder if middle eastern looking tourists are investigated more closely by airport officials?
I think Islam is in general a religion of love and peace. If they could remove the idea of Jihad, that would help a good bit. But, they will never get away from the idea that a country should be ruled by religion. The more Muslims that enter this country, the more they will lull us all to sleep while they pull the rug out.

Not "All' Muslims want nutty conservative Imams calling the shots in society, just as all Christians don't want to be lorded over by Evangelical crackpots. You can see this for yourself in knowing that Iran was a westernized state before the Ayatollah came to power and did stuff like banned bowling, lol. As a teenager, I worked in a shoe factory with Iranians that had all fled that country saying ' that, that asshole banned bowling!" and 'i love Allah, but im not wearing a ffing burqua.'

You speak in generalities about people. You make ordinary people take the rap for what extremists do.

I voted no, what would be sense of requiring an oath? Are they going to start their own political party and maybe win majorities in the House, Senate and SCOTUS, maybe even President? Then get 37 states (I think) to ratify a new amendment so the State can be run by religion. That would be , 'bend over and kiss your @$$ good bye' time.

As long as all Americans living in the country have to sign one, too, no problem. If you choose it for only new immigrate clearly you do not believe in equality.

We have no right to require any litmus test of people "entering" the country, beyond not breaking any of our laws.

We have every right to require that people becoming citizens of this country subscribe to certain things, and in fact, this is already covered by the US Constitution, which every new citizen must understand, accept, and live under.

Here's why I voted 'no'. There are a lot of evangelical Christians who believe that the state should be run by the church. Do we run them down and get oaths?If the govenment makes a very strong statement that the US demands separation of church and state, I don't think more is necessary.

I don't want to make people believe anything, thats facism! Simply upholding the first amendment of the constitution by law will do just fine.