And now the outrage is this.
Sarah respectfully followed the owners instructions and left. I don't think she demanded for service or anything. Instead, Sarah posted to twitter and said, look at what this restaurant did, which sent the message not to go that restaurant to those who support her.
This seems like precisely the way to handle such situations. No lawsuit or anything like gay wedding cake situation.
Maybe I'm missing something??
She broke ethics rules by using her official Twitter account to tweet about the incident. She should have used a personal account to be legal:
"Walter Shaub, federal ethics chief under Barack Obama and briefly Trump and now a fierce critic of the administration, responded: Sanders used her official govt account to condemn a private business for personal reasons... she can lob attacks on her own time but not using her official position." [msn.com]
Are you serious? You want to nitpick on that? It wasn't sharing classified material. Think about how long it took people to actually understand, much less care about what Hillary did. Still today most americans don't understand and/or don't care.
For Sarah's tweet, the left and the right loved it, both sides went crazy over it. This seems like nitpicking. If I'm wrong, please explain ?
I just read the link, and it may be technically correct, but it isn't going to amount to a hill of beans. IMO.
@mosuper You're not missing anything...typical logic from the political left, their spite knows no end. The ironic part is, Provost pretty much admitted that the wedding cake ruling was indeed legitimate, assuming he really felt that way with a restaurant not being forced to cook for Sanders.
She's being treated the way she wants other people treated. Simple as that. She'll never admit that, though, and if she says she does, well, you know she's lying because she's speaking.
I wouldn't want to even be NEAR a Trumpite. HORRIBLE people.