Agnostic.com

4 1

I would like to make a small comment on your gun laws if I may. When your constitution was written the only fire arms that were available were single shot, muzzle loading, black powder muscats and pistols. Do you honestly think those same wise men would have written the law the same way if they could have seen the high capacity, high velocity assault weapons that are available to the public today, by means of the bastardisation of the very law they formulated. If you do, you don't think much of your founding fathers.

billy11 5 July 31
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I care more about kids than I care about guns. That's why I believe in the 2nd Amendment. It helps prevent a takeover of our society from a totalitarian government, and harm to millions of children (and their parents). This has happened so many times in the past. Millions of children, even used in medical experiments. Don't you care about them? Can't you learn from the past, and so help prevent this in the future?

Nobody wants kids shot up in schools. But that is a price we have to pay to help ensure that our kids will have a good world to live in for their future. I don't like having to admit that humanity needs an insurance policy like the 2nd Amendment in order to maximize happiness, but I'm afraid that it does.

Dry your tears, and have some Kleenex on hand for the next shooting. But consider that these children were sacrificed for the betterment of all the other children who will grow up in a society that possesses the ultimate check on an overbearing -- and evil -- government. Their deaths might have allowed millions or even billions to live in harmony. Their deaths were not in vain, as they died for a good and noble cause. With this, they should be referred to as heroes, and not victims. I, at least, shall honor them as such.

@billy11, no, you did not read my tag.

@billy11, you are nothing but a name-caller. So be it.

0

I believe most people in this country agree with you.

1

You are absolutely correct.

0

They probably never envisioned the internet either. Should we ban speech there since the 1st want intended that way?

Your premise is just an opinion. Bearing arms has to do with liberty to protect yourself, even from government. They did have cannons and some versions of high capacity rifles so they knew exactly what they were doing!

@billy11 and yet there are cannons on football fields in many high schools as well. Who cares what you think people need or don't. Ridiculous argument!

@billy11 yeah it ain't the gun it was the one who pulled trigger or do you believe objects act on their own? Spoons feed people? Pencils write stories?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:144265
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.