[en.m.wikipedia.org]

Restoration is essential or things decay and vanish.

Restorations are done all the time. The Parthenon is under reconstruction as we speak. I don't see anybody raising a red flag over it. As long as the work is documented, full disclosure is made, WTF? Go for it.

Thank you, Amisja. The simplest explanation is usually correct.

There are a few things wrong with this article. Firstly it appears to be a UK site but much of the English is American (i.e the word 'vacation' is not generally used in UK), in addition why would anyone stay in London if they are wanting to see Stonehenge? Its miles away. Glasto has tons of hotels. There is no evidence that Stonehenge was ever rebuilt, either by aliens or otherwise. In 1901, the UK was reeling from one war and at the time Stonehenge was in private ownership. There was even talk of dismantling it to create space for new houses. I have studied ancient history of this country for years and early Brits were perfectly capable, over generations, of sailing large Welsh stones to the site, fashion them into monoliths and stand them in place. The simpliest explanation is usually correct.

I have some loss and also comprehend some of the Catholic destroying of its things.

i think it is suspicious that it's on a site that appears to be dedicated to aliens and ufos, and that the pictures may well be pictures of stonehenge being rebuilt... or almost anything else being built or rebuilt, pictures don't lie, but people do lie about pictures. since there is no way to know. i cannot say from this article whether everything it claims is true, but i can tell from other things i've read that a lot of it may be exaggerated, and there is nothing wrong with putting back toppled stones. that's hardly tampering. i was at stonehenge, and it was so long ago i don't remember how close i could get, but there are hours of the day when tourists may go right up to the stones and no one has died of shock at concrete bases yet. so the verdict is still out.

g