Agnostic.com

14 2

Question: Do you accept what you have been taught about freedom in the US?

Atlas_Rising 5 Nov 18
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

14 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Yes. Freedom is for those who can afford it!

0

What freedom?
..taxes, bureaucrats, and war aren't freedom.

moxy Level 4 Nov 18, 2018
0

I am still laughing, my insides are hurting.

@Atlas_Rising Freedom in the US that is a joke. Unless you are rich in the US you are free to starve, free to die from lack of health care and free to get a substandard education. That is freedom in the US.

@Atlas_Rising No, do explain, please.

@Atlas_Rising Ok, Atlas_Rising, how are you going to enforce this law? Are you going to stop going to school, not see a doctor, not drive on roads, not smoke, drink etc, etc. Because all those are paid by taxes and much more.

0

What have I been taught about freedom, that should be the first question. I've been taught that the freedoms listed in the Constitution and Bill of Rights are good, and I pretty much agree with that. I don't know what others have been taught about freedom.

Orbit Level 7 Nov 18, 2018
0

I accept what I have learned by myself, through study, about freedom in the US. I was not taught much about freedom in school.

I have learned that the US was the first nation in the history of the world that was founded on non-religious ideas: freedom and individual rights. I think the Declaration of Independence was one of the most profound documents ever written. I think, as a nation, freedom in the US has gone downhill since its founding -- putting aside the major issue of slavery, which was left intact, out of ignorance and lack of fortitude.

Today, freedom in the US has grown since its founding in some respects, but has shrunk in other respects.

0

I accept nothing about anything uncritically.

I think the intent behind the "American experiment" was good, but the results have been, and continue to be, mixed.

In one sense, American is and always has been a fascist state for example. It's been relatively free for the privileged class, of which I'm a member, but not for certain Hated Others.

Fascism is sorting people by human-ness including "not human at all". We in America have definitely sorted certain groups as "less than", most notably native americans and blacks, but also many other groups, such as the poor, the uneducated, Japanese-Americans during WW2, open atheists during most any time, and more.

But of course when the Nazis studied slavery and Jim Crow in the US and modeled their system in part after how we were conducting ourselves in that regard, but then started goose-stepping all over the world and sorting too many WHITE people as inferior, including light-skinned Jews, then it became a moral imperative to "save the world for democracy" and to be "the greatest generation". This supposedly proves that we aren't really fascist. When in fact we are. We're just far more subtle and deniable about it. Or we were until Trump came along anyway.

Our refusal to own up to our "shadow" and make these things right guarantees that some Americans at least are not "free" in the sense this term is generally meant as in "America is a beacon of freedom". I'd argue, most Americans are not free, because they're "less equal". The truly free ones, the ones with relatively unfettered agency, are the plutocrats, the storied "top 1 percent". Behind them is the shrinking upper middle class, perhaps the top 3 or 4% when lumped with the plutocrats, and the other 96% or so are regarded by the privileged as wannabees and losers who have to live in fear of losing their jobs or a significant medical crisis, and worse.

given socialism is no less authoritarian, and violent than "fascism" why not simply use the term "statist" or barbarian tribalist BS ?
Or is history forgotten ?

@moxy Part of the reason we don't deal with fascism AS fascism is because it's widely conflated with socialism and communism. Also ... socialism itself is conflated with communism and with democratic socialism. Until we untangle that mass of conflated bogeymen, we will never properly deal with any of them.

Also to me fascism is much easier to clearly define. Political conservatives in Europe and Canada for example would be smeared with the label "socialist" by US conservatives. As would US conservatives from the 1950s and 1960s. You know -- their imagined "good old days".

0

Only that which experience has confirmed.

0

We are one the least free of the civilized world. We have more people incarcerated then any other country and too often the strong (or those with guns) are able to take over the freedoms of the weak and minority.

Rancho Cordova - I lived there during the 60's. My dad worked for Aerojet General. Small world.

0

It depends on the context. Do I think Americans are free? yes. Do I think all the military campaigns are to protect our freedoms? No, I think they are more to protect profits of the rich and coporations.

yet without these profits whom would the IRS loot ?

@moxy A lot of the corporate profits are kept offshore. Which begs the question of why are tax payers payign for the military to protect profits that generate no tax revenues?

1

I don't think anyone I have heard preach about freedom has not simultaneously advocated for stripping some American minority of their rights as citizens.
So, no.

1

do you know offhand what i have been taught about freedom in the us?

so if i say whether or not i accept it, will that be meaningful to you?

as it happens, i have learned a lot of things i was not necessarily taught. learning is not about accepting. learning is about understanding and that sometimes requires finding things out that seem to conflict, and figuring out what is true and what is not.

g

0

In this country freedom (and justice) is a function of how much money you have.

Hillary Clinton is a great example of this maxim

@moxy
WTF you going on about Hillary for? She is not President. She did not foist a big tax break for the rich on the American public. She did not take us out of the Paris Accord (in the face of overwhelming evidence that climate change is both anthropogenic and an existential threat). She did not abrogate the only treaty with a chance of slowing or halting Iran's development of nukes. She did not collude with a hostile foreign power to win the presidency. She has not whipped up xenophobia and racism in America. She did not move to kick millions off health insurance and to make it harder for people with pre-existing conditions to get healthcare. She did not loosen rules on financial institutions, increasing the likelihood of an even bigger meltdown of the economy the next time a bank that's too big to fail fails. No, Hillary did none of those things. But Donald J. Trump did.

1

You must be kidding? We are free to be slaughter. Free to pay taxes to subsidize the war machine and religion. No just no.

yet object to taxation and the socialists cry about their free stuff and their war machine

0

No.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:225779
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.