Agnostic.com

5 3

PragerFU: Does Science Argue For or Against God? - misterdeity

phxbillcee 10 Nov 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Science does not argue either for or against God. The god concept is entirely irrelevant to science.

Which, in a big way, is an argument against a god. Everywhere science has looked, he/she/it has been irrelevant. Never a sign or a hint of a sign. If a creator interceder god did exist one would think that somewhere a "signature" would pop up. "Look at the trees" doesn't cut it, no evidence has been shown, anywhere, ever. Until there is, I remain an agnostic atheist. If proof ever appears, I may change my tune, but if it's actually the Abrahamic god, I still wouldn't worship that sick fuck!

0

Thou shalt not waste their time discussing bullshit.

1

Somebody needs a hobby......

2

Just saw one of those. Their pieces are almost always smug and lacking much merit. This one was classic in the odds of life was seen as virtually impossible without their magic man whose supposed existence apparently doesn't fall into a similar odds calculation

Yes you just get the statement, "god is eternal". As if that explained anything, and did not need any explanation itself.

2

The trick they use is to set up a deist god so vague that it can't be disproved, and then hope that nobody will notice when they make the quick jump to the theist god.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:226421
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.