Seriously, why you mad about circumcision. I can only think of a few reasons why a man would be bothered by this with regards to others!

Who are you to tell someone else what to do with their kid barring life threatening circumstance and the law?
Does it upset you that other men go on happily about their way cut while you don't?
What's it to you???

While I would never at this age refuse a man who ticks all the boxes over whether he's cut or not, functional even or not, I can't see why this topic still comes up. Don't want your kid circumsized? Don't do it then, geeez
If I was in the position however, I'd give my son the gift of being cut. And yes, Imma just say it right here that I think men's privates can and often are beautiful, and I've been with more cut, and no one has complained about their circumstance in life! LOL
If you put two twins together , men equal in every way and gave me a choice.... I'd choose "cropped & docked".
At the risk of upsetting men who aren't. I would never at this stage in my life, refuse someone who was near & dear to me based on their man parts should they find my mind equally of worth as I would theirs.
Because that's where I'm at, it's a lot of mental/emotional connectivity, reciprocity.

It is not the same as female genital mutilation, entirely different parts being removed. It would be the equivalent of removing your entire glans., Head of the penis. So no, not the same.

I think the only population in which this is such a cut and dry issue is non religious Americans who have neither environmental nor religious/cultural influence involved in their decision. Two separate experiences (outside of my professional life) that greatly impacted my views and understanding of this subject, I think are important for everyone to consider before making blanket statements:

1. While spending time in a Maasai village where they still practice FGM, (yes it's illegal to do so in Kenya but these people are far removed from civilization and it's laws- though as a more progressive village than some, they give their girls the choice and make it elective and not forced) I had the opportunity to speak to several of the women and girls in the village about it, as well as the chief leader. What I overwhelmingly found was that even when given the choice and having at least some understanding of the health risks, they still chose to go through with it. It is so deeply ingrained into their rituals of transition into adulthood, that they cannot imagine not going through it, as if it would make them less than a woman to opt out.
2. Now onto the boys... my very first trip to Kenya, my very first day at the orphanage where I volunteer, a boy of about 12yrs old (who I later found out had just gone through his age sets circumcision ritual the weeks before I arrived) had been following me closely all day long. I could tell he was itching to ask me something, but when he finally got up the courage, I unfortunately had no good answer for him. He said he had heard something about Americans and wanted to know if it was true. He said he heard we circumcise our boys as babies. Did we really do that? When I replied that yes, many do, but many also don't circumcise at all, he clearly couldn't believe what he was hearing could be true. He then asked me, with this intense look of concern: But if you circumcise a boy as a baby, how does he ever become a man? He honestly could not reconcile the two scenarios in his mind.
   My point is that this is an extremely complicated issue, and hard right or wrong stances will only prevent progress in educating people against the imminent health risks and reducing harm where these practices are so primitive that the risk and benefit scales are tipped against them.

Both are vile

Have you research the difference between the two? Boys are just cutting the forskin off, girls their clitoris is cut up or out so they get no pleasure from sex. Worlds apart girls have died from theirs boys have not!

Well, damn. You just opened about 4 separate cans of worms. I'm starting with the safest stance and speaking to the correlation between circumcision and cleanliness. No, of course, circumcision in itself does not make a penis cleaner, but it does make it easier to KEEP clean. In no way to be mistaken for the only possible way, but the EASIEST. And in some environments that can correlate positively to cleanliness.
I realize my opinion will be received with a grain of salt considering I don't actually have a penis. But I work with them all day long, and at least once a week we see an elderly gentleman who is uncircumcised and has stopped putting the effort into keeping it clean. I'll spare you the gross detail, but suffice it to say they require surgical intervention to fix the complication that results in letting it go. Circumcised men who let it go deal with no more than the occasional urinary tract infection.

I am a strong supporter of genital autonomy as well. Both of my sons are intact. There is no concrete reason for doing it, other than aesthetics. (Unless it is truly medically necessary, [i.e. phimosis, etc.] which isn't very often.)

i am curious as to why you think the cleanliness aspect is junk science.

g