It wasn’t locker room talk. She was giving a public speech and she is an elected member of Congress. Don’t you find it kind of disturbing that people have elected such a foul mouthed idiot!

@Trajan61 "Don’t you find it kind of disturbing that people have elected such a foul mouthed idiot!"

Yes, for a couple years now.

@Wangobango3 he is a well known person who, just like any Congress person has first amendment rights and why does it matter what one says if it doesn't matter what another says? Some have argued, here, that private versus public makes it wrong to defend Trump and his pussy remark, well Nugent wasn't private. And he has openly discussed the idea of running for office which makes him just as open for scrutiny.

See, dear, there are several things about this country I don't like....but I don't go around talking impeachment or insulting Trump, Obama, Clinton or any other President... No, is not "freedom of speech"

No one said it was "Freedom of Speech", but someone said that it was a free country, which means the right to dissent, and clearly that is what she did. If using the word "motherfucker" bothers you, then I guess using the word "pussy" should too.

Given that you brought it up though . . . .
[uscourts.gov]
Freedom of speech includes the right:

1. Not to speak (specifically, the right not to salute the flag).
   West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).
2. Of students to wear black armbands to school to protest a war (Students
   do not shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate.).
   Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
3. To use certain offensive words and phrases to convey political messages.
   Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971).
4. To contribute money (under certain circumstances) to political campaigns.
   Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).
5. To advertise commercial products and professional services (with some restrictions).
   Virginia Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 (1976); Bates v. State
   Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977).
6. To engage in symbolic speech, (e.g., burning the flag in protest).
   Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989); United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990).

Democrat = republican = plutocratic corporate war-for-profit, Zionist-loving stooge. Both teams are hypocrites to the core.

True, it is pre-mature, I would bet that she learned a lesson about being recorded every time she speaks. I would also bet she isn't even close to being the first one to say it.

@Trajan61 Only one delusional here is you.

@Trajan61 ummm, it takes 5 Years for most lawsuits, such as auto-iinhjury cases ,to come to trial......learn something about the system!

A newcomer to congress should be thrown out for unethical conduct for doing that.

@Trajan61 get a life so who cares which religion she is she has 1st amendment rights like any other AMERICAN does!

@Trajan61 Ok, as long as a foul mouth president is too.

@benhmiller Hear, hear. Conservatives do not seem to understand the Constitution, Constitutional rights and the rule of law or care anything about it if they do.

@Trajan61 Howi is using a word in common usage, including popular songs, "unethical"?????????

@AnneWimsey I didn’t realize that was a word that was commonly used by elected members of Congress in a public speech.

@jlynn37 no they make a stink to cause trouble meanwhile they do the same thing!