I would substitute psyche for the soul...
“The human soul doesn’t want to be advised or fixed or saved. It simply wants to be witnessed - to be seen, heard and companioned exactly as it is. When we make that kind of deep bow to the soul of a suffering person, our respect reinforces the soul’s healing resources, the only resources that can help the sufferer make it through.”
~ Parker Palmer
I just had that conversation today. Some words are very religious sounding and need to be replaced. Spirituality is another one.
What IS a soul;
A) in religio-speak, an invisible, imaginary entity constructed by religious ideology and constrained within a living being that only finds release with corporeal death,
b) something that neither science nor medicine has ever detected,
c) a way/method of Authorities to AVOID saying the numbers of ACTUAL lives lost in any disaster, i.e. a cop-out,
Personally speaking, I prefer to think that we all have an individual, internal 'persona' that begins to develop from short after birth that is driven by minute electrical impulses with in our brain and governed by the surrounding, etc, that we grow among and, like our frail, corporeal bodies, it too dissipates after death.
Ergo, there is NO soul.
Interesting but I'd need commentary.
@MissKathleen The confusion I think comes from you suggesting the substitution of "pryche,", but the quoted text using the original word, "soul," Psyche works perfectly well. In fact, it works better.
@MissKathleen Admirable sentiment, but many humans are NOT accepted as they are. Depending on the specific reason, they may not DESERVE to be accepted, or are too irretrievable from the depths of decrepitude. If they cannot or will not change, what of them? My point? These bromides are simplistic at times. If the sage is speaking only of surface imperfections, a skilled gemsmith may tease out hidden treasures. A mental or emotional malady diagnosed and cured, releasing enormous potential. But a psychopathic killer? Beyond repair. A hopelessly retarded cripple can be pitied, and provided charitable lodgings yes, but accepted? A mildly damaged psyche can be soothed, comforted, and given a new lease on life, but a unrepentant pedophile? Throw away the key. So although it would be nice to follow the example the fictitious Christ or Mother Theresa, even the most 'saintly' human being has his or her limits. Or am I being contrarian for its own sake?