Agnostic.com

1 1

Wrong!?

In 1973 the Trilateralists — CEOs from Europe, North America and Japan — met under the chair of David Rockefeller and concluded that people were too well educated and there was an excess of democracy. They then began to “correct” that problem because they believed it created expectations that were too high. To do that they got control of the media and then put in place so-called think tanks such as the Libertarian-inspired Fraser Institute in Canada and the Atlas group in the USA — both receive funding from the Koch Brothers — to dispense propaganda criticizing government politicians and civil servants as well as the educational system.

Thus, they began to Manufacture the consent of the people to be antagonistic towards government officials such as depicted in this meme. The father of spin, Edward L. Bernays, featured in the Netflix movie, Century of the Self, called it Engineering Consent. He believed that the elite had that right because they were successful.

What do you think? Do the elite have the right to engineer or manufacture our consent using public relations?

ToolGuy 9 Apr 9
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

You're stating exactly the opposite conspiracy theory from Noam Chomsky, who thought the Trilaterals wanted to inculcate an excessive trust in politicians and the nation-state, then.

The Commission's founding declaration states:

"Growing interdependence is a fact of life of the contemporary world. It transcends and influences national systems... While it is important to develop greater cooperation among all the countries of the world, Japan, Western Europe, and North America, in view of their great weight in the world economy and their massive relations with one another, bear a special responsibility for developing effective cooperation, both in their own interests and in those of the rest of the world."
"To be effective in meeting common problems, Japan, Western Europe, and North America will have to consult and cooperate more closely, on the basis of equality, to develop and carry out coordinated policies on matters affecting their common interests... refrain from unilateral actions incompatible with their interdependence and from actions detrimental to other regions... [and] take advantage of existing international and regional organizations and further enhance their role."
"The Commission hopes to play a creative role as a channel of free exchange of opinions with other countries and regions. Further progress of the developing countries and greater improvement of East-West relations will be a major concern."

Pretty sinister stuff.

And yes, I'm starting to think there's such a thing as "an excess of democracy". The founders envisioned an educated electorate who would vote intelligently and wisely for representatives who would then govern justly and fairly. What we've got is... a reality show broadcast from the lawn of the White House.

I'm starting to wonder if some type of IQ test before being issued a voting card mightn't be so bad after all.

@ToolGuy And yet, if it's "out in the open", how do people come to the opposite conclusions about its purposes?

What is the upside of going another $1.1 TRILLION into debt in 2020? We're not making infrastructure improvements. We're not funding education. We're expanding the biggest military in the world even further, and giving tax cuts to the rich (again). While the economy slows down.

@ToolGuy Please, enlighten me with what my nation's revolution was really about.

@ToolGuy What this leaves out is the reason for the taxes in the first place. Being taxed endlessly to pay for the Crown's expenses in the war against France was not considered a good bargain. Then there was the Boston Massacre of 1765, the blockading of Boston Harbor, and the general heavy-handedness of the Crown in dealing with its American colonists. Most directly, the order to disarm the rebellious colonists in Massachusetts led to the outbreak of war as well as to the American insistence on personal ownership of firearms, which to this day has made us fairly unique among nations.

Sometimes the answer is right there in the open, indeed.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:327565
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.