CONTROVERSY ABOUT FLUORIDE (SODIUM FLUORIDE IS USED AS RAT POISON)
Scientific Facts on the Biological Effects of Fluorides
Since April 7. 1997 the FDA has had toothpaste containing Fluoride and Sodium Laurel Sulfate include
the warning “Keep out of the reach of children under six. If more than a pea size amount is swallowed
contact your poison control center immediately.”
Unfortunately some manufacturers put it on the box that you throw away before using.
Here is some documentation on the adverse effects of FLUORIDE
Health-Awareness and Harmony (products without fluoride)
310 457 5176
I grew up where water is naturally fluoridated. So has everyone that was born and lives there
I probably did too . Im just saying that it has negative effects on health and many of the side effects are just becoming known. But if i look at the big picture with all the gmo's and the refined sugar and preservatives as well as other chemicals that are in our food supply It makes it seem minor that there is fluoride added to our drinking water. Have you ever noticed that organic food is very expensive at the grocery store while all the sugary and unhealthy food is cheap? Also the fast food places that offer the dollar menu and box deals. Its like the documentary they did on McDonalds. Fat, sick tired , something like that . Like they want us to be unhealthy..
Because I have ingested fluoridated water since I was about 10 (now 70) and have of course have 3 ears, split nose, and extra legs.........
they havnt been florinating the water that long
@TimBo1 ummm, yes, here in Ct they have
@AnneWimsey. So your saying floride is not poison or just that you are immune to it?
@TimBo1 I am saying I'm 70, my teeth are fine, and attached, and no weird side effects noticable. You are saying "dire consequences"........proof?
BTW the active ingredient in mouse/rat poison is NOT floride, it is Warfarin, also known as Coumadin, the most-prescribed blood thinner for stroke/heart attack/ blood clot victims in the world for Decades now, so what does that prove? Absolutely Nothing, methinks
@AnneWimsey ASSET IS YOU. WITH YOUR HELP, WE CAN CREATE CHANGE.
Sign up for our free newsletter for updates on the latest fluoride developments.
Find ways to get involved.
First Name*
Last Name*
Email*
State/Province
Country
JOIN
back to top
Fluoride Action Network
NEW VISITORS
TAKE ACTION
RESEARCHERS
JOIN USDONATE
Issues FAN.tvF.A.Q.NewsAbout FAN
Custom Search
HOME//ISSUES//HEALTH EFFECTS//
HEALTH EFFECTS
Fluoride is a highly toxic substance that can cause a range of adverse health effects. Certain members of the public are at particularly high risk of harm.
SELECT A TOPIC IN HEALTH EFFECTS:
SHARE WITH: back to top back to top
FLUORIDE & HEALTH
TABLE of CONTENTS
Arthritis Gastrointestinal Effects
Bone Fracture Hypersensitivity
Brain Effects Kidney Disease
Cancer Male Fertility
Cardiovascular Disease Pineal Gland
Diabetes Skeletal Fluorosis
Endocrine Disruption Thyroid Disease
Acute Toxicity
INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS
Fluoride is a highly toxic substance. Consider, for example, the poison warning that the FDA now requires on all fluoride toothpastes sold in the U.S. or the tens of millions of people throughout China and India who now suffer serious crippling bone diseases from drinking water with elevated levels of fluoride.
In terms of acute toxicity (i.e., the dose that can cause immediate toxic consequences), fluoride is more toxic than lead, but slightly less toxic than arsenic. This is why fluoride has long been used in rodenticides and pesticides to kill pests like rats and insects. It is also why accidents involving over-ingestion of fluoridated dental products–including fluoride gels, fluoride supplements, and fluoridated water–can cause serious poisoning incidents, including death.
The debate today, however, is not about fluoride’s acute toxicity, but its chronic toxicity (i.e., the dose of fluoride that if regularly consumed over an extended period of time can cause adverse effects).
Although fluoride advocates have claimed for years that the safety of fluoride in dentistry is exhaustively documented and “beyond debate,” the Chairman of the National Research Council’s (NRC) comprehensive fluoride review, Dr. John Doull, recently stated that: “when we looked at the studies that have been done, we found that many of these questions are unsettled and we have much less information than we should, considering how long this [fluoridation] has been going on. I think that’s why fluoridation is still being challenged so many years after it began.”
In this section of the website, we provide overviews of the scientific and medical research that implicates fluoride exposure as a cause or contributor to various chronic health ailments. In 2001, the union of scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency’s Headquarters Office in Washington D.C. stated: “we hold that water fluoridation is an unreasonable risk.”
The research in this section helps to demonstrate why EPA’s union of scientists concluded that fluoridation is an unreasonable risk, and why a growing number of health professionals do as well.
A discussion about the specific health risks (e.g., risks to the brain and thyroid) can be accessed by clicking on the links at the top of this page. The following are reasons why we believe current fluoride policies in the U.S. are unsafe:
Current safety standards only protect against the most obvious forms of harm: Current safety standards for fluoride are based on the premise that severe dental fluorosis and crippling skeletal fluorosis are the first adverse effects that fluoride can have on the body. These effects represent the crudest, most obvious harm caused by fluoride. In the words of American University chemistry professor, Dr. William Hirzy, it would be a “biological miracle” if fluoride did not cause other harm prior to producing these end-stage forms of toxicity. Research already shows, in fact, that fluoride can cause arthritic symptoms and bone fracture well before the onset of crippling fluorosis, and can affect many other tissues besides bone and teeth, including the brain and thyroid gland.
The current “safe” daily dose for fluoride fails to withstand scrutiny: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) states that anyone over 8 years of age — irrespective of their health condition — can safely ingest 10 milligrams of fluoride each day for their entire life without developing symptomatic bone damage. Ten milligrams, however, is the same dose that the IOM concedes can cause clinical signs of skeletal fluorosis within just 10 to 20 years of exposure. People with clinical signs of fluorosis can suffer significant symptoms, including chronic joint pain and overt osteoarthritis. The IOM’s safety standard instills little confidence in the medical understanding that currently underlies fluoride policies in the U.S.
Some people are particularly susceptible to fluoride toxicity: It is well known that individual susceptibility to fluoride varies greatly across the population, and yet, the National Research Council has recently found that breathtakingly large gaps still exist in the safety literature on the effects these populations may be experiencing as a result of current fluoride exposures. The bewildering degree of uncertainties identified by the NRC stands in stark contrast to the IOM’s conclusion that 10 mg/day is so definitively safe that no “uncertainty factor” needs to be applied to protect vulnerable members of the population.
The margin between the toxic and therapeutic dose is very narrow: The NRC concluded that the allegedly “safe” upper limit of fluoride in water (4 mg/l) is toxic to human health. While the NRC did not determine the safe level, their conclusion means that the safe level is less than 4 times the level added to water (0.7-1.2 mg/l) in community fluoridation pro
@TimBo1 ummm, any article that is headlined by Very poor use of the English language is not wasting any of my valuable time....
@AnneWimsey So , by your response I believe I have proved my point. Besides the 3 ears and extra leg and split nose , How many of the side effects have you suffered from the prolonged use of fluoride over the past 60 years? Thank you for your comments as I will not respond any longer to these post as I don't want to "waste your valuable time". Thanks
@TimBo1 ???!!!???you think I was Serious about '"side effects" from floride??? No side effects except I have 90% of my teeth. No wonder you believe all this weirdness you are posting.....