WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH LAND TO BURY THE DEAD
"Washington has become the first state in the nation to pass a law allowing composting as an alternative to burial or cremation of human remains.
Gov. Jay Inslee signed a bill Tuesday legalizing human composting. The bill will go into effect in May next year.
Currently in Washington, bodies can either be cremated or buried. The process of recomposition provides a third option that speeds up the process of turning dead bodies into soil, a practice colloquially known as "human composting." The bill describes the process as a "contained, accelerated conversion of human remains to soil."
So much more useful than revolting moldering in lead-lined coffins. Who Ever thought that was a good idea?
Sometimes they put dead men in wool suits, lol
@St-Sinner so now you got moths in on the action too? Eeeeeewwwwwwwwww....
Funeral and coffin industrial complex lol
I am all for this...I thought the stupidest thing about having my parents cremated was that they required the ashes to be in a sealed container, buried with a small in ground marker...waste of money and it seemed counterintuitive to what they wanted...to go back to the earth...
This option was mentioned but there are many companies that take bodies as a donation to science. This is an excellent option for the following reasons: they pickup the bodies (must get them within a few hours of death), do all paperwork for the death certificate, the one I used took all parts that were needed and cremated the rest of the body and shipped the ashes back to the family and it is all done totally free of charge. I understand that body parts can be sold to medical schools or for transplants but whole bodies are illegal to sell. It was super "clean" and easy and as most folks here understand, when you're dead, you're dead. Burial is simply not sustainable. The old notion that there must be a burial and funeral is not true and completely unnecessary but kept alive by the funeral/burial industry that makes billions of dollars annually.
In the old days, the scriptures said it was Christian to bury the dead to avoid the body from being eaten by vultures and animals out in the open. Nothing more. There is a Parsi community in India that throws dead bodies in a well where vultures eat the bodies.
"Vanishing Vultures A Grave Matter For India's Parsis.
Zoroastrian priests pray to honor the dead inside a temple in Pune, India, on Aug. 18, 2010. ... Parsis forbid images of their funeral ceremonies, where the deceased are taken to the Tower of Silence and consumed by vultures and other birds of prey."
I've wondered about this myself. There just isn't enough room for each person to have a cemetery plot for eternity.
I like that more people are exploring alternatives.
I'd really like to see traditional burials outlawed.
Either go with cremation, or an environmentally-friendly alternative.
I'd also really like to see the entire funeral business, as it currently operates, to become obsolete.
My ex husband says in Guatemala the family has to pay for the space and if they ever stop they take the bones right out. Seems harsh but It also doesn't seem right just to have that land forever..
@MsAl most places, including some churches, purge the bodies every 100 some years. Go to the really old graveyards and often you will find a single monument with many names where the old bones have been relocated to a mass grave.
The two biggest wastes of real estate on the planet are cemeteries and golf courses.
Are you not forgetting places of worship - churches, temples, synagogues, mosques?
I leave brothels out because they serve a useful purpose and prevent violence.
It think it would be great if there was an American backlash against golf. Way to much chemically groomed land for just a few rich guys to pretend to do sports on. They all just stand around plotting to take advantage of the rest of us financially
Yep. I was just up in Oak Park, a Chicago suburb where the dead outnumber the living 3 to 1. I joked about them not voting since the old Mayor Daley died and was laughed at for being naive.
@Beowulfsfriend I used to work in Oak Park, near the Frank Lloyd Wright house, for the Fire Department. I lived in Forest Park.
It was the best part of the years I lived in Illinois.
@MsAl You obviously don't play...I mean that in a way of saying that you have a very limited view on the people who do play...it is relaxing, using math and strategy and can be played competitively by men and women and children...it is not limited to just the rich...it is a safe place to discuss many topics in a non threatening environment...golf courses also offer refuge to animals that have had their homes taken over by malls, cookie cutter developments, etc. ... trees and water provide oxygen/carbon dioxide processing and chemicals are limited to assure that bees and other wildlife can be part of the urban settings...many golfers sponsor charities and golf courses also donate course fees for charity auctions...golfers themselves donate time and money to promote the sport to disadvantage city kids to get them out of their homes into the outdoors...many of us walk...no carts...I have no interest in taking advantage of you or any other non-golfer...
@thinktwice No, I don't play. It was mainly a cheap shot at the president. It is predominately a sport for the white upper class. I do take issue with the amount of environmental damage it takes to sustain that amount of flat green weedless grass. That is not animal habitat. It may have small pockets of it for very few non-troublesom animals.
@MsAl yeah..I know....but remember Obama played as well...I agree on the flat weedless grass, but the trade off is that a lot of people are employed that might not be...always pluses and minuses...I think you are incorrect in your assessment of animal habitat...I have seen deer, alligators, cranes and many other birds, raccoons, etc.