A new theory of climate change.
Professor Zharkova now predicts that due to the movement of the sun around the barycenter of the solar system, she expects a rise in the earth's temperature of approximately 2.5 degrees Celsius between now and the year 2600. She says it is a cycle of about 2000 years, that had it's last minimum in ~1600 during what was called "the little ice age".
But long before that, the sunspot minimum between 2020 and 2055 is expected to cause significant cooling.
Professor Zharkova expresses no opinion in her most recent paper on any CO2 caused warming, but I believe that she thinks it is not an important contributor to warming.
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.There really is nothing you could call scientific evidence of catastrophic warming due to more CO2 in the atmosphere. The 30+ UN climate models all assumed very positive warming feedback from water vapor, and the actual evidence shows slightly negative feedback. The old global warming theory is broken, and Professor Zharkova has presented a new theory that has temperatures rising by 0.5 degrees Celsius per century due to orbital motion of the sun. Extra anthropogenic CO2 may add another 0.2 degrees to that, but not much more than that. And most extra CO2 in the atmosphere comes from warming the oceans to release gas like a warm coke bottle; the primary agent of warming is as it has always been our friend the sun. [drroyspencer.com]
doug6352
Level 7
July 10, 2019
0
I think she's smart enough to know she talking about a different and unrelated warming phenomenon.
Buttercup
Level 8
July 10, 2019
0
Think of it like this, global warming is inside your house and solar output is outside your house. Even when it's cold outside you can turn the heat up or down
...but I believe that she thinks it is not an important contributor to warming.
That's too bad, because increasing carbon dioxide levels have been shown to be breaking all the historical trends the good doctor used in the analysis.
Not that that's importaint, or anything.
1of5
Level 8
July 10, 2019
0
It's important, but not as a significant cause of warming.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.