So you either didn't watch it, or don't get his point... Thanks for playing anyway.

@Captain_Feelgood I did watch please point out what I said that was incorrect

If I don't agree I'm stupid (frowny face) well I think your stupid neener neener

@Buttercup You're making it about guns, when he is talking about how MSM will remark on, and report on things without either finding out the whole story, or putting a spin on the story... It's not that hard to understand if you just think about it a second.. Perhaps if you watch it again without the "anti-gun" goggles on. (why am I even replying to someone that calls me stupid followed by 'neener neener'..?? )

Quote"@Captain_Feelgood So you either didn't watch it, or don't get his point... Thanks for playing anyway. " you called me either stupid or lying first so I repeat neener, neener whatever you say bounces off me and sticks you. However if you are capable of an adult debate you might address whatever mistakes I made in the first paragraph.

@Buttercup What part of "You're making it about guns, when he is talking about how MSM will remark on, and report on things without either finding out the whole story, or putting a spin on the story..." threw you off?

@Captain_Feelgood He said he thinks that the government shouldn't place limitation on the second amendment because they don't place limitations on the first amendment. First lie out of the box and I addressed it in my first sentence. Then HE says the it's about second amend rights which when last I heard was about guns.

@Buttercup That was the story from before that he was using as the example of the point he was making in this video... You totally missed the point he was making here because you were so preoccupied with the side story about guns... WOW...

So you either didn't watch it, or don't get his point... Thanks for playing anyway.

@Captain_Feelgood didn't watch it, glad you enjoyed whatever it was and hope that it enriched your life.

Briefly skimming yours and @buttercup exchange above makes me glad I didn't watch it, since it would appear that the assessment you made was in error.

So whatever.

@1of5 Soooo you can come to a conclusion without knowledge... Wow! But somehow you know my assessment was in error? Wow again.. Willful ignorance is a strange phenomenon. Seriously, why did you even comment? Oh wait... Trolling again.. Gotchya. Thanks for wasting our time.

@Captain_Feelgood from past history I can deduce a lot. I've seen and interacted with both you and buttercup, and I can say without a doubt who I think has more validity - and it ain't you, buckaroo.

The debate we should be having is about the actual validity of the NRA as an entity protecting the rights of gun owners as opposed to being a mouthpiece for gun manufacturers, whether them funneling forgien money into our politics is good or bad, why they're paying 1/4 of thier board members for services, or if the leadership is corrupt and misusing funds. Not some stupid video you think is importaint, and that every other commenter here has panned as bullshit you misrepresented - which is par for the course for you, my friend.