Once Bitch/Mitch refused Merritt Garland, and once they said okay to all that money to be allowed in via citizens united, they ceased to be legitimate.

All branches of our government need to be reformed. The present form is outdated and unable to keep up with changing times and our overblown population.

When Twittler is impeached, every single one of his guys need to go too. #FuckTheMafiaGOP

If they'd never agree, why read it?
The pendulum will swing back the other way, oh, next century or so...

Serves no purpose other than bending interpretation of a dusty old document, the constitution of no authority.

Disband it. Criminalize the bar association that writes statutory law while not even being a govt entity.

Courts, bar assoc are as crooked and federal as the federal reserve bank.

There should be an age limit to prevent senile fools of yielding power in important issues

Start with impeaching Kavenaugh and Thomas. Replace them with ultra progressive 20 year olds.

I wonder if anyone had an issue when George Washington appointed the entire court?

Increase the number of judges but not like the video notes by letting democrats or republicans choose, the court is supposed to be non partisan. At the same time rotate from the federal judge pool by random selection say every five years. My example would be 15 judges and every five years five would be rotated out. Add six to the current total, in five years, five of the oldest serving would be rotated out and continued that way.

Yes!

Without any doubt!

The court is supposed to be govern by the constitution, civil, and criminal law(s) to which a fair and equitable outcome to those who have supposedly been wrong in practice of such laws!

The Obstructionist republicans are stacking the courts with bought and sold overt conservatives judges who are directly in the pockets of wealthy and their corporations!

The courts are overtly corrupted by conservative religious fanatics!

This is how Hilter came to power in 1933 with only 16% of the elected German government, the Fascist were able to have judges appointed who were hard core NAZI's party members who were bought and owned by wealthy and the industrialists who own and control all the major corporations of the German Republic.

Whether it should or should not, it's not going to be reformed.

I don't know, I think by the time you could get any of these things implemented in a fair and unbiased way the technology will have arrived to make any changes you have made obsolete. Technically, we already have this technology but it has yet to be applied in legal situations.

IBM's Watson is able to find abstract patterns in large data sets, meaning it should be able to find contradictions in existing law, suggest rulings and even find loopholes within other laws.

FDR tried adding justices back in the '30s, it didn't work then either.

America is a deeply conservative nation, with brief spurts of liberalism. This is reflected in our history. The liberal periods bring about vast reactionary forces, which we are living through right now.

Partly this is because it's so much easier to unite and hate something new than it is to unite and push for change. It's easier, for instance, to hate Obamacare than it is to support a complex health care law. But slowly, liberalism becomes the status quo.

Not going to read a FB post, but yes, the SC is broken. No idea how to fix it.

But then again I think the constitution is broken and needs to be fixed, too.