As a debater it's Hitch hands down. As a speaker I like Sam Harris, it seems like he puts my thoughts into words better than I could ever do. I love the intelligence of Dawkins. Dennett is the only one I'm not too familiar with.
Bertrand Russell!!!
@maturin1919 asking for my favorite, leaving out the Emeritus. He helped form my atheism at a very young age....around 11. No way I am ignoring him!
And then there is a useful favorite of mine, Michael Scott Earl.
I have never heard of him. Thanks for posting the link, I have to read his books.
@MakeItGood Many of his writtings are available for Free, even free audio versions like this...
Also see my other post on Michael Scott Earl.
Hitch is dead and supported Tony Blair invading Iraq ALLEGEDLY to "save the Kurds" who are still not safe 28 years later....Dawkins is our great hero leading the push to jail Joe Ratzinger alias pope beneDICK
I think Dawkins has move me more now than anyone. At first I thought he was too negative and obsessive towards Religion. I find Dawkins experiments on spiritual is weak, yet on Religion most powerful.
Dawkins spiritual experiments were not good enough for sound conclusion or to draw my curiosity further. I based my life on good sense Not on being rub the wrong way. Because I am unattached when it comes to blue sky visions and knowing how they enhanced my life in practice.
Wouldn't they'd be upset to use a biblical term in order to name them?
They came up with this name themselves.
@Truthseeker1968 of the Non-Apocalypse is missing
I misunderstood some of Dawkins’ major tenants when studying him, I like him better now I’ve got those ironed out. It’s still Hutchins though, mainly because he’s a great public speaker and I don’t know the other two - will have to educate myself
Always been a bit partial to the pale horse and his rider Death because he’s real. The other three seem a bit pretentious for my taste!