yep real intelligent design! Birth defects people who don't care what happens to others! We have an evil thing in our house supported by the evil party.

In this group, I would think this should be the first-and-best argument against ID :

[en.wikipedia.org]

Intelligent design, haha. Appendix and that nerve that wraps around the heart instead of going straight to where it connects on either end, yea, intelligent. I'm sure there are a lot of other minor flaws in"creation" that could have been done more efficiently.

I believe it was evil that said, "I would have started with lasers 8 o'clock day one". The universe is a very complex place we still have a lot to figure out.

Genetics does involve some chance. Genetic drift does follow the same rules as all DNA, but an element of chance is involved when this happens. A great deal of Science involves chance. One the chance occurence is realized, there are physical laws that deal with how that chance occurence is expressed or dealt with.

D.N.A. being a form of intelligence that by chemical reactions create the body of a person. A person is created by the conflation of the D.N.A. INFORMATION from the parents. Let's look at: create
verb
bring (something) into existence.
"he created a thirty-acre lake"
synonyms:generate, produce, design, make, fabricate, fashion, manufacture, build, construct, erect, do, turn out;
bring into being, originate, invent,initiate, engender, devise, frame,develop, shape, form, mold, forge,concoct, hatch; 
informalknock together, knock up, knock off
"the sculpture has been created out of Portland stone" When a Male and female do the reproductive activity, this causes a new being to come into existence. People are creators when making babies.

Often, create is used in context of bringing something from nothing like the big bang myth would speculate. I am not discussing that version here.

Hydrogen, they say is fused in the gravity pressure of stars to build larger elements like helium and the rest of the known periodic table of elements.

When ever a new helium atom is made by fusion it would be a new creation. Not that helium is new but that specific atom is new. The Sun and stars then could be looked at as Creators.

Continue with chemical reactions that bring about compounds that support what we call life having complex cell structures. Each one may very well be a simular copy of another yet they are each created and unique.

Creation by combining or conflation by use of forces is all around. Almost omnipresent maybe.

We are told so many lies as children, that after the loss of Santa, the easter bunny, magic and all their ilk, people tend to draw the line at Adam and Noah for some inexplicable reason.
"Something has GOT to be real" seems to be the cry.
Once you have accepted that here was a pensioner who built a floating zoo and could talk to birds, two nudists in a garden with a talking snake and magic apples is hardly a stretch and makes a carpenter zombie who can walk on water seems positively sane.

Just look at the "design" of our knees (and dog knees too). Either a very bad, very dumb designer, or randomness.

Is the design intellegent?

Most of the designs in the world are inspired by nature. Aircrafts were built on the model of the structure of the bird but we cannot say that they are not spiritual enough, right? Yes, nowadays designs are inspired by science, so what? The science develops and helps to move the world forward. There's nothing we can do with that. Tendencies are not so easy to change. According to vistacreate color guide, simple designs and basic colors are sought-after these days. We are looking for simplicity and science is there to help make our lives more simple.

The dispute between religion and science is eternal, and science or religion wins alternately. It seems to me that it depends on how difficult life is for people at the moment. The majority of believers are usually impoverished, and such people are beneficial to religious organizations. They can be promised paradise after death if their life is so difficult. Recently we created a series of booklets about religion and science, nothing special, just the work of enthusiasts in proposal maker. We distributed these booklets on the city's streets and conducted a social survey. So most people who believe in God live in cramped conditions, sometimes on the verge of survival.

Years ago, in the process of losing my faith, I did a lot of writing on thos subject of evolution vs. Creation/intelligent design. Putting my thoughts down in an organized way really helped to make sense of it all and ultimately realize how little sense the proposition made. It's a little bittersweet and nostalgic to go back and read these diatribes.

LOL, when dealing with one of those IDiots, just tell 'em "Kitzmiller v Dover put that one to bed in 2005, try again". If they balk, remind them that the judge was one of their own. Finally, just concede that we definitely need more graduates qualified in the custodial arts instead of hard science in the future anyway, so by all means, teach ID (the more dead-pan this last line the better; they won't get the sarcasm anyway).

At that point, too much oxygen has already been wasted on speaking to the lout and it is best to disengage and find more productive things to do.

I find that argument comical. They are essential trying to defend some science yet deny other parts of it. I find the biggest part of it is that us homo sapiens have been on this planet for at least 200,000 years. Yet, evolution believing xians deny that the 'god' they say they believe in didn't do anything for at least 197,000 years.

This is Christian video, I am not specifically posting for the dogma. I do like the information about the D.N.A. being a form of intelligence. D.N.A. being what is considered to construct a person's body to bring about their cognitive and intellectual capabilities. Fast forward to 6 minutes and 20 seconds to skip stuff.

I think there may be such a thing as intelligent design, if meant in the deist sense things were set in motion and then left alone.
In that case, did the "designer" then know it'd unfold precisely as it did?
I think not.
"God" can NOT know the future, I propose. At least not every little detail, (especially about what each of billions of people are going to do at any given time!)
Just because some book says so doesn't mean it's true. (Think of all the other things it's wrong about.)
After all, how can we have free will (we do) if everything past, present and to come is already known? Clearly that is not possible.
So I think it plausible "intelligent design" MAY have happened in some "macro" sense. That is, if there was such a thing to begin with.