A possible drug to cure or prevent Coronavirus infection:
Oh no!...not another quack post? What a bonanza time it is for fraudsters to trick the fearful into parting with their money!
Are you saying “Oh no, not yet another quack post” or are you saying that it isn’t a quack post?
@WilliamFleming Sorry William, I didn’t think it was unclear that I meant that I believe you posted a link to yet another post promoting a “quack” cure for Vivid19. I will alter the wording to make it clearer what I mean.
There are A Lot of weird Capitalizations, poor use of contractions and other language oddities in this article.
In addition, no antibiotic is, or ever has been, useful in any way against a virus. Nor do they explain how something spread by mosquitoes (malaria) could have any bearing whatsoever on a droplet-borne virus.
In addition, when I Google some of the acronyms supposedly bolstering the CV of the doctors involved, a lot of them look bogus.
BEWARE!
In addition, there is a handy line in the article where you can "click to donate"...methinks a bunch of grifters, sorry.
Thanks for pointing that out. I am certainly not promoting the group personally, but the article caught my attention as a possible way forward.
On the other hand, there can be correlation without understanding why. Of course the correlation might be temporary and not significant.
I just clicked on their link and saw more information about the theory. Also a google search reveals a lot of corroboration.
I am keeping an open mind—not that that will do anything.
@Leontion as noted on Thursday's Rachel Maddow show, the FDA has NOT done that.
@Leontion live feed from NYTimes this morning(friday)...FDA approval is Not given yet.