Agnostic.com

4 0

This is just one reason why I question the numbers of deaths and infection rates for Corvid 19.

dave1459 8 Sep 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

As far as questioning the numbers, we didn't even have working tests until several weeks/months into the pandemic. I believe I had covid-19 in January, but have no way of knowing, since we had no tests. I may be one of the millions who had it, but was never tested/counted.

I returned home from international travel in January, where I spent 14 days with sick relatives all of whom had recently traveled internationally, of course I caught what they had. On my way home I spent 10 hours on a plane with a sick seatmate from China. With 104 degree fever and many other symptoms, I went to Urgent Care in my home town and they called the CDC and a PCR nasal swab (the long one) sample was taken -- and a week later, I was told the test was canceled. Whether I didn't meet the narrow criteria for a test, or simply the fact that we had no working tests yet, my sample was never tested.

It took me 10 weeks to recover from my mystery illness. I've never been so sick in my life. All other illnesses were ruled out, so I'm pretty sure I'm one of the millions who had it but with no test result, am not part of the count.

I don't trust the numbers, because I feel they are likely far higher than reported. Mistakes like what is posted above show ineptness, but just shows we can't trust the numbers either way.

1

So a bookeeping/clerical error makes you doubt almost 190.000 dead just in this country......good luck with that

@dave1459 only a small % of rapes get reported because we women saw what happened to Anita Hill, and our friends who got raped. That is a personal choice,nothing to do with your contentions! And what $$ "paid to states"?
Oh, and how Exactly did she get this letter if she has been dead longer than "mail forwarding, "which is only 90 days.....

1

I'm not trusting the government testing program that just began this week in Hawaii.

The surgeon general paid a visit to our state last week, and encouraged our leaders to spend the CARES act money on 90,000 covid self administered nasal swab tests, offered to free to our residents, in a drive-through fashion over the next 2 weeks. The tests are then sent off to a mainland lab each day for processing, rather than paying a lab here in our own state.

Turns out the first day of testing, 1,700 of the 5000 test samples were mis-labeled and had to be thrown out so folks had to come back to a testing site, wait in line again.

Then, next day at least 4 people were notified they were positive, who hadn't even taken the test yet. The test is only 90% accurate in the first place.

It is seeming to me that this "surge testing" being offered to various areas is just another way for the government to pay a small lab on the mainland a lot of money for all these tests, and possibly artificially make our positivity rate appear that it's going down, right before the election. I'd be willing to bet that whoever chose the lab to process these tests owns stock in it. With so many mistakes made just in the first week, I don't think many of us here feel confident in the program.

I'm not trusting much at all regarding the numbers, with the government run operations, but the hospitalizations and deaths are sobering.

@dave1459 The lab selected by the Trump Administration to process these millions of tests is eTruthNorth and they boast about the 90% accuracy of these self administered swab tests (as opposed to the more evasive, but more accurate long swab test) but that assumes everything else goes right....

With 1 out of every 10 tests being wrong, plus all the screw ups this government employees made in mis-labeling 1700 of the samples just on the first day, on top of the unknown number of wrong names attached to the tests to have had at least 4 positives attributed to people who hadn't even taken the test yet, gives me no confidence at all.

I wouldn't be surprised if they are just randomly picking the results out of a hat, without running any tests on the samples at all. I'd feel better if the samples were at least tested in a lab in our own state, so someone could oversee it.

0

So, testing didn't begin until March. And the sample might have been stored or backlogged. What's the mystery?

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:531029
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.