I desire to make an observation that has intrigued me since joining this site. Not a judgement, rather an observation.

As a teacher, it is agreed by many of my colleagues and myself that we spend a great deal of time trying to explain the significance of how first appearances effect how people react and respond upon first meeting. E.g. How, when a student goes for a job interview, first appearances can often decide whether you get hired or not.

Because a person meeting you for the first time has only sight clues to go on to decide whether you are safe to approach or a risk. Many are very fearful of those who appear too dissimilar to themselves. Its a shallow approach to evaluating another's worth, but it's the rule as opposed to the exception. We broadcast our politics and cultural proclivities by the way we look.

Now to my main point of this post. In many ways, the same can be said about the "monikers" people on this site call themselves. Because we have no way of evaluating one another upon first encountering besides our moniker. Its interesting what people name themselves. IMO the moniker speaks volumes about the person to which it is attached.

Some are cute, some are clever, some are insightful, some suggest the person is hiding.
It is an insight as to how that person perceives themselves. Regardless, it is the first impression many of us get into you. Just sayin'. Lol.