The poor guy clearly didn't realise he was lacking in one small aspect of his faith

@Salo Even Jesus couldn't walk on water now, not after they put holes in his feet.

@Willow_Wisp Speaking of, why did the ladies love Jesus?

If one has a boat and a camera we can get a picture of anyone walking on water. There is a sand spit in the middle of the Columbia River here and when the tide is right one could walk on water and get a picture of it.

I thought they end up at Walmart......

I usually watched them from my car, although I have also been on foot, unarmed, nearby. It they're not hungry and you don't get too close, they leave you alone.

Actually, they do. One of man's defence mechanisms is that he doesn't taste good, so given a choice lion will eat something else, usually gazelle.
Hunger however ......

@Petter right, go in then, be my guest.

@Mofo1953 I have, frequently. But at midday, when lion are dozing in the shade, and have eaten. It was part of growing up in the bush. And I wasn't so stupid as to approach them, merely walk past at a respectful distance.

@Petter "he doesn't taste good" ... How do you know this?

@jlynn37 ... because given a choice they usually avoid eating people, and prefer to eat herbivores.
Like many carnivores, they seem to avoid eating other carnivores.

@Petter the post didn't mention choices, glad you are sometimes not stupid to tempt them, but your comments about carnivores and herbivores is really way out there, I've seen big cats kill hyenas, crocodiles, other big cats like cheetahs, meat eating monkeys, etcetera so perhaps your "bush" experience ain't all that.

@Mofo1953 Where were they? And did they actually eat them all?
A hungry lion, usually a solo male, will eat what meat he can find, but in general a pride of lionesses go for herbivorous, plains animals.

@Petter still trying to justify your mistake? Give it up dude. You were wrong. Admit it and move on. You're digging yourself deeper and deeper for what? Self satisfaction?

@Green_Soldier71 I caught hell for calling atheist out for gloating about his death rather than having empathy for a victim of relgion, not to in any way justify his behavior.

@Green_Soldier71 Did you not watch the video? If you did your comment makes no since. For future reference try examining the content before commenting so that one dies not make ones self look like an idiot.

@Green_Soldier71 No problem it happens all the time and I am guilty of it myself!

Well, I did watch the whole video, as painful as it was to get through, and I still think you are completely wrong. Doing something because you think it's the right thing to do shouldn't grant you some magical anti-mocking aura when said thing blows up in your face. Ya know, Hitler risked his life to do what he thought was the right thing to do, too.
But the most important factor for me is that people who preach/indoctrinate/brainwash have the power to effect others' lives in catastrophic ways. Did him dying prevent him from corrupting others? Think about the person that corrupted him in a manner that ultimately lead to his death (and, as you pointed out, the potential deaths of those that killed him). The spread of misinformation can cause exponential damage, so maybe we should revel when a vein of it gets snuffed out. I, for one, hope every single religious person in the world tests the claims of their respective religions until they either die or realize it's all bullshit.

@JeffMurray If you are unable to have empathy for victims of brainwashing I can not help you. The condition you have discribed does have a name (psychopath) and I do recommend that you get proper mental help.

@DavidLaDeau No, you're just blind to the fact that I have empathy for the truly blameless, the non-brainwashed victims of the brainwashing victims.

@JeffMurray I am not blind to that and I agree just as I said in the video. They are all human beings and all victims, Why not have empathy for all victims and recogonize them as such? What is so hard about that?

@DavidLaDeau Some people believe admonishment and scorn are valuable tools in shaping beliefs and behaviors. People worry about how they'll come off or be remembered. If they'll bring shame to their family. It's obviously not effective on everyone or preventive of all negative behaviors for those that do, but it is a tool that can have a positive effect. If making fun of [religious] idiocy can save even one person from a terrible fate, it seems like a small price to pay. Maybe you're fine with more people dying for the sake of being polite to those that are responsible for their deaths, but I'm not.

@JeffMurray There is a difference between empathy and scorn. Yes scorn the idiots, but at the same time it is okay to have empathy. There is no reason for there not to be both present. I use scorn myself to a level few would have the audacity to with my Revered Faithful charactor. Even so the charactor is inspireed by empathy.

@DavidLaDeau I didn't suggest there wasn't a difference. My point still stands. If admonishment and scorn had prevented his mentor from passing on such dangerous misinformation, he might be alive today (and not personally subject to admonishment and scorn himself). So instead of realizing the benefit of breaking the cycle of indoctrination with a little name calling (remember sticks and stones...) that may prevent death you choose to coddle those idiots and call me a psychopath. You're an inspiration to us all.

@JeffMurray I do not disagree with name calling, embarrissment, scorn or the lot. It is the dehumanization of a human being who died also a victim of religion that I take issue with. On one stops to mention that they were human being victims when such scorn is thrown down. Only laughs. This is not a position it seems eitherr of us take.

@DavidLaDeau I'm not exactly sure what you're saying here. You seemed to have a problem with the Darwin Awards. I think they're a good thing.