I thought it was the music of the Ainur under Illuvitar. (Tolkien)

Yoh almost understood biblical text "It should have been "In the beginning was the conversation" John 1:14 ... the conversation of the old textiment became flesh,(a person) [ because that is what the old testiment people talked about].

The new testiment is the written Eye witness accounts that the "conversation " became a person.

Study psychology of eye witness testimony being contradictory accounts and you would understand #1 writers of new testiment was a genius to makes witness testimony have contradictions as psychological science says witness testimony would have so that the new testiment would appear valid as contradictory eye witness statements.

OR

#2 the new testiment really is eye witness accounts that gave scientific psychological correct contradictions that the old testiment conversation became a person.

If my memory serves correctly, in a passage from the Aramaic ( somewhat earliest version of the whole mythology) it states that, In the Beginning of time, the God, Yahweh, spaketh to ALL other Gods saying, "Here I shall create ALL things, both Good and Evil for over those shall we ALL rule for evermore."
So, logically speaking, does not this One True God of Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc, alike, NOT admit, openly, that IT IS NOT the ONLY God?
So, does this NOT beg the questions such as,

1. Who, precisely was in attendance to record such a conversation and report it,
2. does this not negate the Christian claim that in Exodus, " God entered Egypt and defeated all the False Gods of Egypt,
3. Who were all these 'other Gods,' etc,
4. did these other God simply take 'early retirement' and leave it all up to the Abrahamic God.
5. and most important of all imo, just how much SHIT can you stack up in pile before the whole pile collapses under its own weight?

Just too many hung up with all this fantasy land hoop la!!!

Not Genesis.

John 1:1 In the beginning was the logos (word) ... John 1:14 ... the word (logos) became flesh (a person).

What it could be observed for what John was saying is that Jesus character was spoken into existence from the thoughts to spoken words of the people of the old testiment.

Jesus character quoted at least 81 times in new testiment referring to himself as "son of man(kind)". Offspring, product of mankind. A creation of the people-gods of the old testiment speaking Jesus character into existence. John 10:34 Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are "gods"'?

Gods create, from Genesis, the biblical elohim created by speaking.

Logos is cognition attributes thought, reason, word (speach) capabilities.

There is double means entwined in biblical text.

Within Hellenistic Judaism, Philo (c.  20 BC – c.  50 AD) adopted the term into Jewish philosophy.[7] Philo distinguished between logos prophorikos ("the uttered word" ) and the logos endiathetos ("the word remaining within" ).[8] wikipedia

3056. logos ►
      Strong's Concordance
      logos: a word (as embodying an idea), a statement, a speech
      Original Word: λόγος, ου, ὁ
      Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
      Transliteration: logos
      Phonetic Spelling: (log'-os)
      Definition: a word (as embodying an idea), a statement, a speech
      Usage: a word, speech, divine utterance, analogy.

In addition, do we have any idea how it was mistranslated from Aramaic or its original language or its oral traditions into Greek? That's the trouble with language, it's interpretive so that any particular translation will necessarily include interpretations from the translators. If one looks at the dozens of interpretations of the Bible on a site like Biblegateway, we can compare various passages interpreted and trsnslated differently. It brings the notion of inerrancy of the Bible into focus, so that the response to anyone who says something like "the Bible says it, I believe it, and that's the end of discussion" is to ask, "which Bible?"

Very interesting.