Agnostic.com

6 5

Biologists taught us that there are no human races, an information that is not really interesting given the fact that "race" is not a biological category. The smallest taxonomic unit in biology is the subspecies. For example, all dogs, be it a poodle or a German shepherd, are just a subspecies of the wolf (Canis lupus familiaris; biologically, dogs are "family wolves" )

Biologically, all humans are Homo sapiens sapiens, that is common knowledge. But many people insist on dividing (and judging!) people according to their skin colors (or other features).
As far as I can tell, there are mainly two groups in particular that still insist on using the concept of "race" when applied to human beings: on the one hand, the identitarian right, in order to celebrate "whiteness" and denigrate or even hate everything else ("White supremacy" ).
On the other side the identitarian left which still needs the concept of "race" in order to denigrate "whiteness" ("critical whiteness" or "White priviledge" ) and to celebrate "Blacks" and "people of color". (By the way: isn´t it strange that those who claim to fight racism still use affirmatively concepts invented by racists 300years ago?)

So what happened to the dream of Martin Luther King and others that one day we become colorblind, and that people are judged by what they do and say, not by the color of their skin, or their being a member of community X or Y?

What irritates my in particular is that not only the fools and morons, but even a lot of really smart people, those who have higher education, and who should know better, they still use the concept of "race" as if it taught us something about the essence of an individual, whereas in reality it is literally just skin-deep, and should be of minor importance.

Matias 8 Dec 26
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Sometimes thinking in terms of race is useful, oftentimes not. Often in US media EVERYTHING is portrayed as having huge racial component to it, when reality is the racial component may be there in a very small amount or even non-existent. For instance I recently heard a story very similar to another story I had heard in past. In story A one participant is white, one minority. In story B both participants are same ethnic minority group. Well story A is in the national news and there is an attempt to blame the white person for being racist because of what has happened. The tone in the article was highly critical of "racist" white person even though no evidence is ever presented of white person being racist in the incident. In story B, which is very similar, this idea is never brought up because ppl are same race/ethnic. Just because there are two different races involved in some level of conflict doesn't mean race has anything to do with it. In so many US news media stories there are frequent rush to oversimplify problems and blame it all on race. It's a bountiful source of misrepresentation and untruths. Now do some have racial component? Yes. But I see a huge amount in media where it could just be completely not racial at all, but falsely attributed or over emphasis on race. The inherent problem with this is that it furthers racial division, probably makes huge numbers of minorities feel targeted and that they are living in a completely racist society, and also fails to address the more complex issues that are truly at play in the situation which is itself a disservice to the affected ppl.

0

That horrible nonsense has gone on for far too long. It's high time we accept that socio-economic-cultural factors divide people.

0

I don’t know how to get around the issue of race while it is still being used to determine who gets a “Just drive safely ma’am” and who gets arrested.

skado Level 9 Dec 26, 2020

@Matias
I am under the impression that it is racism they are concerned with; not race. And I am not familiar with the specifics of university campuses of which you speak. Hoping you will inform me.

@Matias
It may well be that I am under-informed about current events these days. I rarely go looking for news, and know only what spills into my awareness while using social media. A Google search for "rising tensions on many campuses in the US" returns nothing that makes it clear tensions are about race instead of racism. If you could send a link to an article about such an event it would be most helpful.

In particular I would find it difficult to imagine that there are places where racism simply doesn't exist. And even if that were to be the case, those campuses still exist in a world full of racism, so for students to be concerned about issues they face in the world seems quite understandable.

A couple of items that showed up:

[adl.org]

[apmreports.org]

0

And it is far, far less likely that a 'white skinned' Ancestor of the Species Homo sapien EVER trod the soils of Africa or the trails from Africa to the rest of World.

1

It seems that we “homo sapiens”...cannot get past the visual difference of colour, because elements on either side of the black/white coin, find it easy to exploit our fears of those who do not mirror our own outward appearance. Under the skin, as you point out, we are all exactly the same species of animal.

1

I totally agree. I have been railing against the use of the term "human race." for many years. I do not understand why some people persist in using the term.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:563802
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.