FACE PALM!

Where to start?

To begin "Religious science" is an oxymoron.
Religion is based on "Faith." Faith is belief without evidence.
Science is based on "Facts" Facts dictate a need for evidence. Faith has no merit in science.

The rest of of your assertions are classic example of WOO. Sad.

That is some high-quality gibberish. Sorry, rocks don't have force-fields and crystals don't have magical properties, etc,etc.

I'd like to give you a more detailed response but I feel that a simple "that's gibberish" is sufficient

Demonstrable facts are facts; the facts are not negated by whether you do, or do not believe in them!!

So what is this quantum of faith called and how is it measured?

Would that scientist happen to have a book or two published and translated from Japanese?

What?

There is no such thing as religious science, there is just science. Science has never once proven that believing something is sufficient to make it materially real. Quantum physics does not prove any of what you said. Quantum physics cannot be used to test any of what you said.

There is no such thing as religious science. Faith and / or belief do not equate to fact. You can believe whatever you want, but facts are still facts whether you believe in them or not.

Faith is belief without evidence. Confidence is belief with evidence.

The rest of what you stated is not peer reviewed scientific evidence. It’s nothing more than unproven pseudoscience. I think you are in the wrong place for that.

The above isn't real science. Part of the above can be explained through placebo effects and part through the chicken and egg syndrome, where you cant' really prove if the thoughts or hte presumed results came first. Often peopel will convince themselves that their thought predicted events, when if you actually keep trqack, they didn't.

It is very easy to set up an experiment where you know wha tresults you want, and of course you will get those results, but the experiment itself ws flawed by bias, because the person had an agenda and set up the "experiemtnt " in such a way that the agenda woudl be supported. That is called "junk science".

Proper science sets out to fidn the truth, an dhas no agenda or invested emotions about the outcome of experiments.

"Magical Thinking" has no place in sciece.

I’m assuming you are speaking about Masaru Emoto and his book “hidden messages in water”. It’s cute, but it’s pseudoscience.

Sorry, but none of what you posted is provable. I call shenanigans. You catch a cold by exposure to the novovirus. Nothing else. I buy my lottery ticket in a nice part of town and still don't win. I didn't expect to because I understand statistics and probability.

Feel free to post the sources for your “science”. You gotta be careful with those kinda words because there are actually scientists here. LoL! I like the attitude you are expressing here, but it has a lot more to do with psychology than quantum mechanics. Actually, it has nothing to do with quantum mechanics. I like your optimism though! That is where solutions and creative action come from!

Are you living on this planet.?

The mind is a unique piece of machine that exist from nothing to nothing.
Mind manipulates and projects what it whats you to see feel and experience
Everything is made of energy vibrating at different frequencies that mind is not able or would not want you to experience until you reach that relevant stage